2020
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1817601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven machine criticality assessment – maintenance decision support for increased productivity

Abstract: Data-driven decision support for maintenance management is necessary for modern digitalized production systems. The data-driven approach enables analyzing the dynamic production system in realtime. Common problems within maintenance management are that maintenance decisions are experience-driven, narrow-focussed and static. Specifically, machine criticality assessment is a tool that is used in manufacturing companies to plan and prioritize maintenance activities. The maintenance problems are well exemplified b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst them, the multi-attribute criticality analysis, both at asset level and component level is the most widely used [12]. Despite its relevance, the multiattribute criticality analysis currently suffers of some limitations, mainly related to the unavailability of historical data to evaluate asset performance; this limitation is especially true in the beginning of life (BoL) of the asset, where only qualitative information through a subjective judgment from experts could be extracted if no benchmarking is possible [13]. Furthermore, for companies owning geographically dispersed facilities, the way the multiattribute criticality analysis is performed may differ and an overall cross-plant evaluation for budget allocation by the headquarter may be challenging, even unfeasible, due to this potential misalignment [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst them, the multi-attribute criticality analysis, both at asset level and component level is the most widely used [12]. Despite its relevance, the multiattribute criticality analysis currently suffers of some limitations, mainly related to the unavailability of historical data to evaluate asset performance; this limitation is especially true in the beginning of life (BoL) of the asset, where only qualitative information through a subjective judgment from experts could be extracted if no benchmarking is possible [13]. Furthermore, for companies owning geographically dispersed facilities, the way the multiattribute criticality analysis is performed may differ and an overall cross-plant evaluation for budget allocation by the headquarter may be challenging, even unfeasible, due to this potential misalignment [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this challenging background environment, this paper starts from the internal enterprise to process the uncertain demand orders from the market, and uses the manufacturing execution system (MES) to formulate the corresponding production plan and implement scheduling for the orders [5,7]. In contrast to previous studies, the novelty and contribution of this paper are in the implementation of product lot sizing and scheduling, in addition to consideration of uncertain demand information, as well as the novel proposition of the problem of product switching in multi-variety process industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, production assets require monitoring and scheduling the associated maintenance actions (preventive and corrective). Fortunately, the evolution of technologies has led to an Industry 4.0 where managers can predict failures and conduct maintenance operations remotely and in real-time [2]. However, they remain confronted with the limitation of budget and resources dedicated to maintenance [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%