2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven model for hydraulic fracturing design optimization. Part II: Inverse problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it comes to HF, the balancing act between incremental future revenue and execution costs poses a significant optimization challenge. There is limited research on incorporating cost implications (like net present value -NPV) into fracture parameter optimization (Duplyakov et al, 2022).…”
Section: Optimization Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When it comes to HF, the balancing act between incremental future revenue and execution costs poses a significant optimization challenge. There is limited research on incorporating cost implications (like net present value -NPV) into fracture parameter optimization (Duplyakov et al, 2022).…”
Section: Optimization Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most work employ ML to predict the production profile and cumulative production after a fracturing job (Temizel et Syed et al, 2022). Others adopt ML to determine the inverse problem of determining the optimal hydraulic fracturing parameters given a desired production output (Duplyakov et al, 2022;Sprunger et al, 2022). Such parameters include proppant and fluid volumes, fracture length, number of HF stages, and pump rates.…”
Section: Ml/ai For Hf Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of machine learning and artificial intelligence involves several stages: data collection, data preparation, choosing the machine learning model, training, and testing of the model and validation [138]. Different researchers have applied artificial intelligence methods to predict geological [139], petrophysical [140], and geomechanical properties [141] and production and enhanced oil recovery methods' efficiency for shale and tight reservoirs [142,143]. A systematic review of the application of artificial intelligence by Syed et al [144] has shown an exponential increase in the publication of artificial intelligence applications to shale and tight reservoirs.…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings showed the ten most important feature optimizations of hydraulic fracturing. Furthermore, Duplyakov et al [143] utilized the data of Morozov et al [142] to identify the parameters for optimization of hydraulic fracturing by an inverse approach. The optimization methods used in this study showed that increasing the proppant mass and reducing the average proppant concentration were vital to maximize the well productivity.…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that a 73% increase in fluid volume and a 38% increase in proppant use could double postfracture production. Under boundary constraints, Duplyakov et al (2022) used the high-dimensional black box approximation function to optimize fracturing design parameters based on Ridge regression and CatBoost algorithm. They also used particle swarm optimization, sequential least squares programming, surrogate optimization model and differential evolution optimization method to solve the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%