Data-Driven. Privacy, Surveillance, Manipulation

Fossa, Fabio

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22982-4_3

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In parallel, a key requirement is to control (and clean up) datasets, fight disinformation and foster truly diverse, inclusive and reliable content (Georgieva et al 2022). These transformations support benefits and trigger uncertainties, especially as the above-mentioned driver functions reveal challenges of socio-technical issues with inequalities (Holton and Boyd 2021), system biases (Rawat and Vadivu 2022), cultural-economic colonization (Bell 2018), data colonialism (Couldry, and Mejias 2019), data-driven surveillance with privacy issues (Fossa 2023) and political destabilization through fake campaigns (Borsci et al 2023). The interactivity and virality of personal assistants, virtual influencers, AI-produced content and art, or deepfakes leads to fundamental questions such as how information sources can be evaluated or how they will add value to an existing ICM process or service.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling AI Trust for 2050: perspectives from media and info-communication experts

Feher,

Vicsek,

Deuze

2024

AI & Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study explores the future of AI-driven media and info-communication as envisioned by experts from all world regions, defining relevant terminology and expectations for 2050. Participants engaged in a 4-week series of surveys, questioning their definitions and projections about AI for the field of media and communication. Their expectations predict universal access to democratically available, automated, personalized and unbiased information determined by trusted narratives, recolonization of information technology and the demystification of the media process. These experts, as technology ambassadors, advocate AI-to-AI solutions to mitigate technology-driven misuse and misinformation. The optimistic scenarios shift responsibility to future generations, relying on AI-driven solutions and finding inspiration in nature. Their present-based forecasts could be construed as being indicative of professional near-sightedness and cognitive dissonance. Visualizing our findings into a Glasses Model of AI Trust, the study contributes to key debates regarding AI policy, developmental trajectories, and academic research in media and info-communication fields.

show abstract