2021
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abe08d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven profile prediction for DIII-D

Abstract: A new, fully data-driven algorithm has been developed that uses a neural network to predict plasma profiles on a scale of τ E into the future given an actuator trajectory and the plasma state history. The model was trained and tested on DIII-D data from the 2013–2018 experimental campaigns. The model runs in tens of milliseconds and is very simple to use. This makes it a potentially useful tool for operators and physicists when planning plasma scenarios. It is also fast enough to be used for real-time model-pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These combined benefits reduce the controller development cycle and accelerate the study of alternative plasma configurations. Indeed, artificial intelligence has recently been identified as a ‘Priority Research Opportunity’ for fusion control 14 , building on demonstrated successes in reconstructing plasma-shape parameters 15 , 16 , accelerating simulations using surrogate models 17 , 18 and detecting impending plasma disruptions 19 . RL has not, however, been used for magnetic controller design, which is challenging due to high-dimensional measurements and actuation, long time horizons, rapid instability growth rates and the need to infer the plasma shape through indirect measurements.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combined benefits reduce the controller development cycle and accelerate the study of alternative plasma configurations. Indeed, artificial intelligence has recently been identified as a ‘Priority Research Opportunity’ for fusion control 14 , building on demonstrated successes in reconstructing plasma-shape parameters 15 , 16 , accelerating simulations using surrogate models 17 , 18 and detecting impending plasma disruptions 19 . RL has not, however, been used for magnetic controller design, which is challenging due to high-dimensional measurements and actuation, long time horizons, rapid instability growth rates and the need to infer the plasma shape through indirect measurements.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020; Yellapantula et al. 2020; Abbate, Conlin & Kolemen 2021; Bai & Peng 2021; Hatfield et al. 2021; Maschler & Weyrich 2021; Brunton & Kutz 2022).…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control Problems. We tackle five control problems: the standard underactuated pendulum swing-up problem (Pendulum-v0 from Brockman et al [2016]), a cartpole swing-up problem, a 2D lava path navigation problem, a 2-DOF robot arm reacher problem with 8-dimensional state (Reacher-v2 from Brockman et al [2016]), and a simplified beta tracking problem from plasma control [Char et al, 2019, Mehta et al, 2020 where the controller must maintain a fixed normalized plasma pressure using as GT dynamics a model learned similarly to Abbate et al [2021]. The lava path is intended to test stability and exploration of algorithms.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The action is the next change in the power injection level. The "ground-truth" dynamics for this problem are given by a neural network model learned from data processed as in Abbate et al [2021]. Control is done at a timestep of 200ms and the reward function is the negative absolute deviation from β n = 2.…”
Section: Description Of Continuous Control Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%