2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0100076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven quantification of model-form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged simulations of wind farms

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) remains the most cost-effective approach to study wake flows and power losses in wind farms. The underlying assumptions associated with turbulence closures are one of the biggest sources of errors and uncertainties in the model predictions. This work aims to quantify model-form uncertainties in RANS simulations of wind farms at high Reynolds numbers under neutrally stratified conditions by perturbing the Reynolds stress tensor throug… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has not been spared. ML has been applied for turbulence modeling [5][6][7] , flow control 8,9 , reduced-order modeling 10 , optimization [11][12][13] , among others. An overview of ML applications in CFD can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has not been spared. ML has been applied for turbulence modeling [5][6][7] , flow control 8,9 , reduced-order modeling 10 , optimization [11][12][13] , among others. An overview of ML applications in CFD can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outliers show a slight overestimation of f 1 (x) and a reasonably high underestimation of f 2 (x). RANS models the turbulence instead of resolving it and levels of known uncertainties in RANS turbulence models (including k − ω SST) have been documented against high-fidelity methods [30,31,[119][120][121]. Therefore, marginal inaccuracies when modelling complex turbulence are expected as seen in the results.…”
Section: Iv35 Pareto Front Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%