2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0149547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven Reynolds-averaged turbulence modeling with generalizable non-linear correction and uncertainty quantification using Bayesian deep learning

Abstract: The past few years have witnessed a renewed blossoming of data-driven turbulence models. Quantification of the concomitant modeling uncertainty, however, has mostly been omitted, and the generalization performance of the data-driven models is still facing great challenges when predicting complex flows with different flow physics not seen during training. A robust data-driven Reynolds-averaged turbulence model with uncertainty quantification and non-linear correction is proposed in this work with the Bayesian d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, with the advancement of machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are able to make predictions based on huge amounts of available flow data, data-driven RANS turbulence modeling has been recently developing [13]. The data extracted from either experiments or high-fidelity CFD simulations are infused into the learning procedure, while ML techniques are used to link the turbulence modeling behavior to geometric and mean flow variables [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, with the advancement of machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are able to make predictions based on huge amounts of available flow data, data-driven RANS turbulence modeling has been recently developing [13]. The data extracted from either experiments or high-fidelity CFD simulations are infused into the learning procedure, while ML techniques are used to link the turbulence modeling behavior to geometric and mean flow variables [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%