2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data‐driven sensor placement for state reconstruction via POD analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the optimal sensors' locations for signal reconstruction is still an open challenge that numerous studies have attempted to solve by different methods (e.g., Manohar et al (2018); Castillo and Messina (2019); Yildirim et al (2009); Annoni et al (2018); Caselton and Zidek (1984); Krause et al (2008); Joshi and Boyd (2008); Powell et al). Three of these methods will serve as baseline of the present study.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determining the optimal sensors' locations for signal reconstruction is still an open challenge that numerous studies have attempted to solve by different methods (e.g., Manohar et al (2018); Castillo and Messina (2019); Yildirim et al (2009); Annoni et al (2018); Caselton and Zidek (1984); Krause et al (2008); Joshi and Boyd (2008); Powell et al). Three of these methods will serve as baseline of the present study.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Bellingham (2008) added to the EOFs extrema method a constraint on the cross products of EOFs to select the sensors' locations, and applied it to Pacific sea surface temperature reconstruction. Using the same kind of constrained EOFs analysis, Castillo and Messina (2019) proposed a data-driven framework based on a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to determine the optimal locations for power system oscillation monitoring and state reconstruction. In this study they selected iteratively the locations with highest POD amplitude and lowest cross coupling between the modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the Apache Spark or Kafka platforms is also gaining traction among researchers and the power industry to develop a scalable, heterogeneous data ingestion and distributed analytics platform. Entergy 2285 [83,84] Poland #1 2383 [40,43,54,61,62,103,107,119] Poland #2 2746 [38,43] Poland #3 3120 [110] Poland #4 3375 [64] USA #3 4520 [85] Mexico #2 5449 [144] USA #4 8000 [92] add further richness to the data by using offline modelgenerated data, especially to capture the influence of lowprobability, high-impact events and to detect unforeseen patterns. This is particularly useful for applications that are geared towards detecting anomalous data, cybersecurity intrusions, and ensuring grid resilience-something for which not many past works have designed optimal measurement placement methods, as shown from the reviews in Sections 2 and 3.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that buses with a strong correspondence to the largest Lyapunov exponent are more significant from the system stability standpoint, and they should be made observable with higher priority. See also [144]. The drawback of these approaches lies in their dependence on an explicit energy function, which is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Measurement Placement In Transmission Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that buses with a strong correspondence to the largest Lyapunov exponent are more significant from the system stability standpoint, and they should be made observable with higher priority. See also [145]. The drawback of these approaches lies in their dependency on an explicit energy function, which is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Voltage Control In Transmission Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%