2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2020.100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven smart charging for heterogeneous electric vehicle fleets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using residential charging data, the best performing model in this work achieved MAE of 0.124 minutes and RMSE of 0.158 minutes. Oliver et al [67] used a dataset consisting of charging processes, i.e. timeseries data of charging power, from a workplace to predict charge profiles.…”
Section: Supervised Learning For Analysis and Prediction Of Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using residential charging data, the best performing model in this work achieved MAE of 0.124 minutes and RMSE of 0.158 minutes. Oliver et al [67] used a dataset consisting of charging processes, i.e. timeseries data of charging power, from a workplace to predict charge profiles.…”
Section: Supervised Learning For Analysis and Prediction Of Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best result using PSF model with average SMAPE: 14.06% [64] Predict energy consumption of a session PSF-based method using kNN SMAPE: 7.85% [65] Classify whether the driver will use fast charging Binary log. regression Accuracy: 0.894 [66] Predict the time to next plug for residential charging SVR with radial basis MAE: 0.124 minutes, RMSE: 0.158 minutes [67] Predict charge profiles in workplace XGBoost, LR and ANN Best result using XGBoost MAE: 126 W. Integration to scheduling lead to in up to 21% increase in charge. [68] Develop model to predict charging speed using temperature, connection time, SOC LR - [69] Predict charging capacity and daily charging times.…”
Section: Various ML Including Psf Svr Rfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many tractable models for battery charging behavior exist, these models require information about the specific battery pack and the initial state of charge of the vehicle [30], [31]. Other models rely on machine learning to learn the relationship between state of charge and current draw [32]. However, these machine learning models still require access to the state of charge of the vehicle.…”
Section: B Battery Management System Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With their ability to give precise, local overviews of the flexibility capacity available, AI-based programs could support SOs' manual flexibility management (Esmat et al, 2018;Radecke et al, 2019). Alternatively, flexibility management could be automated: AI could be applied to balance the electricity net autonomously without human involvement (Shen et al, 2018;Frendo et al, 2020). Small-scale experiments in which AI-based programs are taking over the tasks of an SO within a micro-grid are already taking place (Reijnders et al, 2020).…”
Section: Opportunities Of Ai For System Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%