2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Envelopment Analysis: A knowledge-driven method for mineral prospectivity mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, machine learning methods such as regression approaches can be used for modeling the relationships between predicted and predictor variables to determine the weight of each predictor variable in this approach. While in the knowledge‐driven approach, the predicted variable is not available and cannot be obtained by observations; therefore, it is evaluated by experts' knowledge through Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making (MCDM) methods (Hosseini & Abedi, 2015; McKay & Harris, 2016; Rajabi et al, 2014; Stevens & Pfeiffer, 2011). The MCDM, as a knowledge‐driven approach, is very useful in modeling semi‐structured problems with less‐explored areas such as spatial decision‐making problems.…”
Section: Methodology Concepts and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, machine learning methods such as regression approaches can be used for modeling the relationships between predicted and predictor variables to determine the weight of each predictor variable in this approach. While in the knowledge‐driven approach, the predicted variable is not available and cannot be obtained by observations; therefore, it is evaluated by experts' knowledge through Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making (MCDM) methods (Hosseini & Abedi, 2015; McKay & Harris, 2016; Rajabi et al, 2014; Stevens & Pfeiffer, 2011). The MCDM, as a knowledge‐driven approach, is very useful in modeling semi‐structured problems with less‐explored areas such as spatial decision‐making problems.…”
Section: Methodology Concepts and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banker et al (1984) developed a model assumed to be variable returns-to-scale, known as BCC. In recent decades, DEA has rapidly expanded into new application areas (Cook and Seiford, 2009; Hatami-Marbinia et al , 2011; Shabani et al , 2015; Hosseini and Abedi, 2015; Wu et al , 2016; Chen et al , 2017; Rosenthal and Weiss, 2017; etc). The following model shows an input-oriented CCR model.…”
Section: Used Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of these models (e.g., C-means) is to identify the underlying distribution of predictor variables and further use them to guide MPM (Abedi et al 2013b;Jahangiri et al 2018;Wang et al 2020). The major techniques of the knowledge-driven approach include the Boolean logic (Zaidi et al 2015), index overlay (Aryafar and Roshanravan 2020) , Dempster-Shafer belief theory (Carranza et al 2008) , fuzzy logic (Abedi et al 2013a), wildcat mapping (Carranza and Hale 2002), outranking methods (Abedi et al 2013a), and data envelopment analysis (Hosseini et al 2015), self-organizing map (SOM), and K-means clustering (Zuo 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%