Data Fusion Enables Better Recognition of Ceiling and Visibility Hazards in Aviation

Abstract

Low cloud ceilings and poor visibility claim the lives of more general aviation (GA) pilots and passengers than any other cause of weather-related GA accidents. Experience shows that instrument-rated pilots as well as those rated only for visual flight are vulnerable to low ceiling and visibility (C&V), making total avoidance the most powerful strategy available to a GA pilot dealing with these hazards. The weather awareness needed for avoidance begins with the recognition of current conditions. This article outlines how fusion of surface, satellite, and terrain data yields a graphical analysis product that enables GA pilots, dispatchers, and weather briefers to better visualize the areal distribution of recent and current C&V conditions across the contiguous U.S. The product is available at www.aviationweather.gov/adds/cv and indicates ceilings less than 1,000 ft above ground level, visibilities less than 3 statute miles, and regions where terrain obscuration is possible. The product is also viewable in the context of interactive geographic information system data via the experimental Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Tool available at http://weather.aero/tools/desktopapps/hemstool. The authors summarize verification results and outline work toward a next-generation product that incorporates the use of model forecast data and weather camera imagery to improve information in data-sparse regions. This next-generation product is in development for initial use in Alaska.

Effect of small‐scale surface heterogeneities and buildings on radiation fog: Large‐eddy simulation study at Paris–Charles de Gaulle airport

“…Fog has a strong impact on personal safety and on the economy, especially in the field of transportation. Adverse ceiling and visibility conditions contribute to 35% of the weather‐related accidents in the civil aviation sector and cause 168 fatal casualties per year on average (Herzegh et al , ). Adverse visibility conditions strongly reduce an airport area's traffic flow.…”

The Effects of Display Type, Weather Type, and Pilot Experience on Pilot Interpretation of Weather Products

“…Finally, pilots with varying levels of flight experience rely on the same products to plan and carry out their flights. Given the high GA weather-related accident rates, the influx of new, complex technology, and the varying experience levels among GA pilots, consideration should be given to the interpretability/usability of new weather Atmosphere 2021, 12, 143 2 of 15 products. Thus, the current study compares the interpretability of weather products with respect to type of display, type of weather phenomena, and GA pilot experience level.…”

Spatiotemporal visibility characteristics impacted by forest and land fire over airports in sumatera and borneo Island, Indonesia

“…Visual flight rule (VFR) require pilots to monitor weather conditions (including visibility) by vision. The best strategy for a potentially vulnerable pilot when facing a visibility weather minima situation according to flight rules is to avoid the landing (Herzegh et al 2015). If the airport, plane, and pilot have the capacity to fly with instruments (Instrument Flight Rule/IFR), the visual limitations of the eye can be replaced by consideration of instrument information.…”