1994
DOI: 10.1109/7.303748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data fusion of decentralized local tracker outputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We must mention that the word "fusion," which appears often in the aforementioned references, usually refers to the "combination" of classifiers for improving classifier performance using a single training data set and not necessarily to "data fusion" (combining information coming from different data sources). Commonly used methods for "data fusion" are generally based on Bayesian theory [32], [33], state estimation with Kalman or particle filtering [34]- [39], evidence theory (DS) [40], [41] and its variations [10], [42]- [45], information theoretic framework [46], neural networks [47], and evolutionary algorithms [48], [49]. The traditional application area for data fusion has long been target detection and tracking [38], [39], [50]- [54].…”
Section: B Ensemble Approaches and Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We must mention that the word "fusion," which appears often in the aforementioned references, usually refers to the "combination" of classifiers for improving classifier performance using a single training data set and not necessarily to "data fusion" (combining information coming from different data sources). Commonly used methods for "data fusion" are generally based on Bayesian theory [32], [33], state estimation with Kalman or particle filtering [34]- [39], evidence theory (DS) [40], [41] and its variations [10], [42]- [45], information theoretic framework [46], neural networks [47], and evolutionary algorithms [48], [49]. The traditional application area for data fusion has long been target detection and tracking [38], [39], [50]- [54].…”
Section: B Ensemble Approaches and Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (21) and (13) indicate that the status equation of the system was linear, and the measurement equation was nonlinear. For this nonlinear system, the most commonly used filtering method is the Extended Kalman filter (EKF) [2] . Unscented Kalman filter (UKF) is an improved method upon the EKF, and it can overcome the difficulties of the EKF, such as the large linearization error of and the likelihood of ill-conditioned covariance 12] .…”
Section: Target Tracking Filtering Frame Based On the Sequential Unscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target tracking is a process of estimating the status of the target by combing the measurements by radar and infrared imaging sensors. Literature [1] carried out the Kalman filtering for each sensor, and a further Kalman filtering of the filtered results in the fusion center (KF/ KF); literature [2] implemented Kalman filtering for each sensor, and the extended Kalman filtering for the results in the fusion center (KF / EKF); literature [3] used unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to solve the nonlinear filtering problem; all these methods are limited to the situation when the measured noise is subject to Gaussian distribution. Literature [4,5] solved the temporal change problem of the parameters in the nonlinear system by building a multi-mode interaction model (IMM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the distributed data fusion is said to be optimal, compared to the centralized data fusion, it often has the approximate optimal performance under some assumptions or conditions. For early results about distributed data fusion, please refer to [74][75][76][77]. BarShalom [78] proposed that there exits the same process noise in the dynamic of different sensors.…”
Section: Distributed Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%