2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3041928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Fusion With Inverse Covariance Intersection for Prior Covariance Estimation of the Particle Flow Filter

Abstract: The prior covariance estimation method based on inverse covariance intersection (ICI) is proposed to apply the particle flow filter. The proposed method has better estimate performance and guarantees consistent estimation results compared with previous works. ICI is the recently developed method of ellipsoidal intersection and is used to get the combined estimate of prior covariance. This method integrates the sample covariance estimate, which is unbiased but usually with high variance, together with a more st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesis Two H O2 : Students taught Technical drawing using a Web-based intelligent tutoring system, and those taught using the traditional teaching technique in terms of their mean interest scores. "Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Summary for the Test of Significant Difference in Interests Mean Scores between Students Taught Technical Drawing Using a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System and Those Taught Using a Conventional Teaching Method [27], [28] " 4 Shows, The F-calculated value for the influence of instructions on interest, is shown in Table 4, along with a comparison of students taught technical drawing using a web-based intelligent tutoring system versus those taught using a traditional teaching method. The calculated F value for the groups is 1698.93, and the level of significance for F is.00, which is less than.05.…”
Section: Hypothesis One H O1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis Two H O2 : Students taught Technical drawing using a Web-based intelligent tutoring system, and those taught using the traditional teaching technique in terms of their mean interest scores. "Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Summary for the Test of Significant Difference in Interests Mean Scores between Students Taught Technical Drawing Using a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System and Those Taught Using a Conventional Teaching Method [27], [28] " 4 Shows, The F-calculated value for the influence of instructions on interest, is shown in Table 4, along with a comparison of students taught technical drawing using a web-based intelligent tutoring system versus those taught using a traditional teaching method. The calculated F value for the groups is 1698.93, and the level of significance for F is.00, which is less than.05.…”
Section: Hypothesis One H O1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights and the cubature points of the DICI-GFCKF algorithm are calculated according to the generalized cubature rule, and the algorithm steps are as follows [32], [33]:…”
Section: A Generalized Cubature Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a fusion result that guarantees consistency and less conservative than CI, inverse covariance intersection (ICI) was proposed [32]. It was proved that the covariance of the ICI is smaller than CI [32], [33]. As CI has been extended to GCI, both the EI and ICI are also extended to a generalized ellipsoidal intersection [34] and nonlinear inverse covariance intersection (NICI) [35] to fuse arbitrary pdfs, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thing to note (25-28) is, by changing covariance Recently, ICI is proposed to obtain fusion results, which guarantee consistency and less conservative than CI [32]. It is proved that the covariance of the ICI is smaller than CI [32], [33]. The ICI formula can be written as [32], , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%