SummaryInterface terminologies used in electronic health records must be re-evaluated and revised to reflect current health care practice and knowledge. To enable future revisions of the Omaha System Intervention Scheme, investigators evaluated formal semantic structure of target terms and concept duplication of problem and target terms. Using linguistic principles and qualitative analysis, five themes were found. A multidimensional formal semantic structure for the intervention target term was proposed. Concept duplication was examined for 16 problem-target matches. Clinical data enabled assessment of the validity of a proposed formal semantic structure and concept duplication. Recommendations are suggested for future development of the Omaha System Intervention Scheme.
Research Article 318Applied Clinical Informatics
BackgroundA goal of health informatics is meaningful use of clinical data, including structured data generated through documentation [1][2][3]. The capture of meaningful clinical data depends on the integration of interface terminologies within electronic health record (EHR) systems [4]. Interface terminologies are defined as "unique vehicles for supporting efficient and accurate interaction between healthcare providers and computer-based clinical applications" [5 (p. 65)]. Nursing has led in the development of interface terminologies since the 1970's, with the intent of encoding clinical narrative into structured form [4]. Because data generated by interface terminologies give voice to health care practice and outcomes, it is essential to clearly articulate the conceptual structure of each terminology as a basis for knowledge discovery [4,6]. The American Nurses Association [6] established a formal recognition process for such terminologies in 1992. Currently, eight interface terminologies are recognized. Of these, four can be used to describe interventions for community-based care: Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC) [7], International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) [8], Clinical Care Classification (CCC) [9], and the Omaha System [10]. It is beyond the scope of this article to describe all interface terminologies. However, there are many similarities between interface terminologies; thus this study may serve as an exemplar for refining and revising other terminologies. The overall purpose of this project was to identify the formal semantic structure of Omaha System target (Phase I), and to analyze free text data associated with Omaha System target 'other' (Phase II), in order to inform the use and future development of the Omaha System Intervention Scheme. Other defined terms in the Intervention Scheme had strong semantic structures (i.e., problem = topic, category = verb) and thus were not addressed in this study. The purpose of this paper is to describe our findings from Phase I. Findings from Phase II are reported separately [11].
Evaluation ModelDue to the dynamic nature of the health care environment, terms used to describe health care services and client health needs ar...