2016
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2016.96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Mining and Automated Discrimination: A Mixed Legal/Technical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Everyone should get a chance to succeed, we should judge every person based on his/her individuality, not based on their gender, race, ethnicity, etc. This is an explanation many people give; see, e.g., [1].…”
Section: Is It Legitimate Statistics or Is It Sexism?mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Everyone should get a chance to succeed, we should judge every person based on his/her individuality, not based on their gender, race, ethnicity, etc. This is an explanation many people give; see, e.g., [1].…”
Section: Is It Legitimate Statistics or Is It Sexism?mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A critical system design choice is how aggregation is performed, which party performs the aggregation, and what the implications of the aggregation design are for the citizens. On the one hand, collecting individual citizen data to perform a centralized aggregation at the site of the service provider requires the reveal of personal data and opens up opportunities for discriminatory data analytics [31,115]. For instance, utility companies can perform energy disaggregation to infer with high accuracy the lifestyle and residential activities of citizens [55].…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities In Data Gathering: Distributed mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic community has been cognizant of these issues from the outset of emergence of the concept of knowledge discovery and technologies of data mining by proactively studying a variety of countermeasures including such approaches as adversarial learning or a suite of diverse privacy mechanisms, among others. One can point here to interesting studies and review materials on privacy preserving in data mining (Cuzzocrea, ) (Wang, Luo, Zhao, & Le, ), security (Xu, Jiang, Wang, Yuan, & Ren, ), legal aspects (Carmichael, Stalla‐Bourdillon, & Staab, ), and general considerations on ethics and technology (Munoz, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%