2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining derived from food analyses using non-invasive/non-destructive analytical techniques; determination of food authenticity, quality & safety in tandem with computer science disciplines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many published methods for detection of food contamination utilizing traditional machine learning algorithms (Bisgin et al., ; Ropodi, Panagou, & Nychas, ; Ravikanth, Jayas, White, Fields, & Sun, ). There are potential possibilities for deep learning to replace the traditional machine learning method to achieve better detection results for food contamination in different food production procedures.…”
Section: Food Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many published methods for detection of food contamination utilizing traditional machine learning algorithms (Bisgin et al., ; Ropodi, Panagou, & Nychas, ; Ravikanth, Jayas, White, Fields, & Sun, ). There are potential possibilities for deep learning to replace the traditional machine learning method to achieve better detection results for food contamination in different food production procedures.…”
Section: Food Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best region selection for freshness evaluations was based on the results of the developed PLS models. Smaller models were also developed by selecting the most influential wavelengths using the I-PLS forward algorithm of interval selection [39]. This algorithm selects a subset of variables for building the PLS model, which will give a similar prediction compared to using all the variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample number of Class I was a little small, which may not represent generality. SPA is just one among plenty of feature selection methods [20] , leaving the effectiveness of other selected wavelengths questionable. Similarly, more classifiers shall be introduced into the model to test the effectivity and universality.…”
Section: Classification Of Sprouting Potato Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%