2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11726-017-1023-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining for points-selection rules in acupuncture treatment of mammary gland hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows that among the 16 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] included randomized trials of acupuncture for the treatment of MGH, the experimental group had a total sample size of 610 and a significant effect of 562, while the control group had a total sample size of 622 and a significant effect of 467. Heterogeneity test results (I²=0%, P=0.51) were based on a fixed-effect model.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows that among the 16 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] included randomized trials of acupuncture for the treatment of MGH, the experimental group had a total sample size of 610 and a significant effect of 562, while the control group had a total sample size of 622 and a significant effect of 467. Heterogeneity test results (I²=0%, P=0.51) were based on a fixed-effect model.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RR=1.22, 95%CI: 1.16-1.28,,Z=7.79,P<0.00001, indicating that the total effective rate of the experimental group was better than that of the control group. Figure 4 shows that among the 11 [5][6][7]9,[11][12][13][14][15][17][18] included randomized trials of acupuncture for the treatment of MGH, the experimental group had a total sample size of 413 and 144 were cured, while the control group had a total sample size of 426 and 87 were cured. Heterogeneity test results (I²=0%, P=0.67) were based on a fixed-effect model.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation