2015
DOI: 10.1051/metal/2015040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining – new perspectives on predicting coke quality in recovery stamp charged coke making process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ash in coke can be guaranteed within the required range only if the ash in mixed coal is controlled, and the ash in coke is generally 1.3-1.4 times that in mixed coal. So the ash of mixed coal in general is controlled between 9% and 10% [1].…”
Section: Ash (A D ) Ash In Coal Remains In Coke After Cokingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ash in coke can be guaranteed within the required range only if the ash in mixed coal is controlled, and the ash in coke is generally 1.3-1.4 times that in mixed coal. So the ash of mixed coal in general is controlled between 9% and 10% [1].…”
Section: Ash (A D ) Ash In Coal Remains In Coke After Cokingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing trend of large-scale blast furnace, smelting effect of blast furnace and its economic and technical indicators are more deeply influenced by the quality and performance of coke [1]. Unfortunately, various types and proportions of mixed coal can lead to different coke quality [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallurgical coke plays a key role in the blast furnace ironmaking process -it must maintain the permeability of the furnace so liquid iron may be drained from the furnace and combustion air injected into the base of the furnace (Riley 2007;Tiwari et al 2015). To maintain permeability the coke must maintain a good size distribution and shape while being subjected to mechanical loads, high temperatures, attack by oxidising gases and dissolution in the blast furnace liquids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in prime hard coking coal is not an appropriate action for stamp charge coke oven batteries because it increases oven wall pressure and coal blend cost. Hence, many researchers have tried to efficiently use non-coking coal to reduce the coal blend cost without compromising the coke quality. Several factors like the intrinsic properties of coal and weathering phenomena also affect coke quality . The literature reported that the poor quality of coke affects the ironmaking process mainly in two ways, viz., (i) the blast furnace operations team increases coke rate to meet the process requirements if the coke quality deteriorates significantly and (ii) the coke plant process team increases the PHCC coal composition in the coal blend, resulting in high blend cost to improve the coke quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%