2015
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2015.1122278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining on road safety: factor assessment on vehicle accidents using classification models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the ANN model compared with the proposed Hybrid model. The Comparative performance of both models showed that the proposed model (Hybrid K means and random forest) performed better than the ANN model in terms of Precision, Recall, F1 score, Gu et al [21] PSO-SVM China -Xiao et al [52] SVM, KNN (Ensemble) I-880 data set 99.33% Castro et al [15] BN, JR8 and MLP DVSA-UK 72.39%, 72.02%, 71.70% Respectively Al-Radaideh et al [4] RF, ANN (backpropagation), SVM Uk 80.6%, 61.4%, 54.8% respectively Casado et al [14] LCC, MNL Spain -Wahab et al [51] MLP. SimpleCart, PART Ghana 72.16%, 73.45%, 73.81% respectively Sameen et al [40] MLP, BLR, RNN Malaysia 65.48%, 58.30%, 71.77% respectively Fentahun [18] J48, ID3, PART Ethiopia 81.21%, 81.01%, 81.18% Seid et al [42] HMR Ethiopia NA Abebe et al [1] DSA Ethiopia -Lytin et al [30] UBA Ethiopia - and Accuracy.…”
Section: Comparative Of Neural Network and Proposed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, the ANN model compared with the proposed Hybrid model. The Comparative performance of both models showed that the proposed model (Hybrid K means and random forest) performed better than the ANN model in terms of Precision, Recall, F1 score, Gu et al [21] PSO-SVM China -Xiao et al [52] SVM, KNN (Ensemble) I-880 data set 99.33% Castro et al [15] BN, JR8 and MLP DVSA-UK 72.39%, 72.02%, 71.70% Respectively Al-Radaideh et al [4] RF, ANN (backpropagation), SVM Uk 80.6%, 61.4%, 54.8% respectively Casado et al [14] LCC, MNL Spain -Wahab et al [51] MLP. SimpleCart, PART Ghana 72.16%, 73.45%, 73.81% respectively Sameen et al [40] MLP, BLR, RNN Malaysia 65.48%, 58.30%, 71.77% respectively Fentahun [18] J48, ID3, PART Ethiopia 81.21%, 81.01%, 81.18% Seid et al [42] HMR Ethiopia NA Abebe et al [1] DSA Ethiopia -Lytin et al [30] UBA Ethiopia - and Accuracy.…”
Section: Comparative Of Neural Network and Proposed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This includes evaluating the severity of traffic collisions, analysing their causes and/or predicting the probability of fatal and serious injuries. Previous research efforts demonstrated that Bayesian networks predict collision severity better than traditional methods such as regression models [24,25].…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies employed other machine learning techniques to investigate crashes risk factors and predict injury severity levels. Some of these tools include Bayesian networks [27] modified neural network pruning algorithm N2PFA [28], recurrent neural networks [29], data clustering [30,31], and non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm with a neural network classifier [32].…”
Section: Decision Trees and Artificial Neural Network Onmentioning
confidence: 99%