“…In this study, the ANN model compared with the proposed Hybrid model. The Comparative performance of both models showed that the proposed model (Hybrid K means and random forest) performed better than the ANN model in terms of Precision, Recall, F1 score, Gu et al [21] PSO-SVM China -Xiao et al [52] SVM, KNN (Ensemble) I-880 data set 99.33% Castro et al [15] BN, JR8 and MLP DVSA-UK 72.39%, 72.02%, 71.70% Respectively Al-Radaideh et al [4] RF, ANN (backpropagation), SVM Uk 80.6%, 61.4%, 54.8% respectively Casado et al [14] LCC, MNL Spain -Wahab et al [51] MLP. SimpleCart, PART Ghana 72.16%, 73.45%, 73.81% respectively Sameen et al [40] MLP, BLR, RNN Malaysia 65.48%, 58.30%, 71.77% respectively Fentahun [18] J48, ID3, PART Ethiopia 81.21%, 81.01%, 81.18% Seid et al [42] HMR Ethiopia NA Abebe et al [1] DSA Ethiopia -Lytin et al [30] UBA Ethiopia - and Accuracy.…”