2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2018.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-mining the diaryl(thio)urea conformational landscape: Understanding the contrasting behavior of ureas and thioureas with quantum chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the solid state, all novel phosphinourea Au(I) complexes display an intact Au–Cl bond with the P–Au–Cl axis nearly parallel to the biphenyl axis, as expected. The urea moiety generally adopts an anti , anti- conformation ( Au1, Au6 , Au10 , and Au13 ) but displays the much rarer anti,syn one 24 in Au4 and Au8 and shows various degrees of out-of-plane twisting of the aryl substituents (compare Au1 and Au10 in Scheme 3 ). In the solid state, the urea group establishes H-bonds either with chloride ligands or with other urea units, depending on the ligand scaffold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the solid state, all novel phosphinourea Au(I) complexes display an intact Au–Cl bond with the P–Au–Cl axis nearly parallel to the biphenyl axis, as expected. The urea moiety generally adopts an anti , anti- conformation ( Au1, Au6 , Au10 , and Au13 ) but displays the much rarer anti,syn one 24 in Au4 and Au8 and shows various degrees of out-of-plane twisting of the aryl substituents (compare Au1 and Au10 in Scheme 3 ). In the solid state, the urea group establishes H-bonds either with chloride ligands or with other urea units, depending on the ligand scaffold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These computational methods were previously identified as amongst the most accurate for the evaluation of thiourea binding modes and conformations. [16,21] First, we investigated the conformationso ft hiourea 2g.O ur results, obtained with an implicit solvation model for toluene, indicate that the syn,anti conformation of 2g is preferred, as it is more stable than the commonly drawn anti,anti conformation by 2.0kcal mol À1 (Figure 1). Both these conformationse xhibit aO -H•••S hydrogen bond between the CF 3 CHOH and the thiocarbonyl functional groups.T he most stable anti,syn and syn,syn conformations of thiourea 2g werea tl east 4.0 kcal mol À1 higher in energy.O ur results are in line with literature precedents that have established that the anti,anti and syn,anti conformations are both accessible for diphenylthioureas in solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these conformationse xhibit aO -H•••S hydrogen bond between the CF 3 CHOH and the thiocarbonyl functional groups.T he most stable anti,syn and syn,syn conformations of thiourea 2g werea tl east 4.0 kcal mol À1 higher in energy.O ur results are in line with literature precedents that have established that the anti,anti and syn,anti conformations are both accessible for diphenylthioureas in solution. [16,21] In addition, Xray structures of 2c and 2h revealed that both thiourea and alcohol groups were involved in hydrogen bonding. [22] In particular,f or 2h as hort intramolecular H-bond (2.25 )w as observedb etween the OH andC =Sgroups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,31,32 This hydrogen bonding ability is governed by a combination of factors including the Brønsted acidity 17,33 and the conformational preferences of the dual hydrogen bond donor motifs. 2,16,17,34 Both of these factors are important when designing anion receptors and organocatalysts; energetic penalties apply if a conformational change is required for the formation of both H-bonds to a guest or substrate, while it is generally accepted that increased Brønsted acidity correlates with an increase in hydrogen bond strength 2 that is required for effective substrate binding.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%