2022
DOI: 10.33480/pilar.v18i1.2912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Mining Using Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and Adaboost Models for Prediction and Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Cancer

Abstract: This study predicts and classifies benign and malignant breast cancer using 3 classification models. The method used in this research is Random Forest, Naïve Bayes and AdaBoost. The prediction results get Random Forest = 100%, Naïve Bayes = 80% and AdaBoost = 80%. Results using Test and Score with Number of Folds 2, 5 and 10. Number of Folds 2 Random Forest model Accuracy = 95%, Precision = 95% and Recall = 95%, Naïve Bayes Accuracy = 93%, Precision = 93% and Recall 93%, AdaBoost Accuracy = 90%, Precision = 90… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a machine learning model, such as Random Forest, Naive Bayes, or SVM, is trained on a labeled dataset of resumes and their corresponding job domains. The trained model is used to predict job domains for each pre-processed resume, and the accuracy of the model is evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score (21) .…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a machine learning model, such as Random Forest, Naive Bayes, or SVM, is trained on a labeled dataset of resumes and their corresponding job domains. The trained model is used to predict job domains for each pre-processed resume, and the accuracy of the model is evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score (21) .…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tools used to process the data store were using Orange Data Mining Tools. Orange Data Mining was a data mining tool that gave better results than other tools [24]- [27]. Figure 4 shows the flow of the classification process.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%