2013
DOI: 10.1177/0165551512473723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data models for version management of legislative documents

Abstract: This paper surveys the main data models used in projects including the management of changes in digital normative legislation. Models have been classified based on a set of criteria, which are also proposed in the paper. Some projects have been chosen as representative for each kind of model. The advantages and problems of each type are analysed, and future trends are identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is a standard encoding of Greek legislation (as presented in Section 3.1), there is no standard encoding for the codification of amendments or repeals. This is a challenge for any work [10,4] like ours to which we offer the following solution. By the analysis of a large corpus of Greek legislation and the consultation of Greek government officials, we have defined three main types of legislative modifications: insertion, repeal, and substitution.…”
Section: Legislative Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a standard encoding of Greek legislation (as presented in Section 3.1), there is no standard encoding for the codification of amendments or repeals. This is a challenge for any work [10,4] like ours to which we offer the following solution. By the analysis of a large corpus of Greek legislation and the consultation of Greek government officials, we have defined three main types of legislative modifications: insertion, repeal, and substitution.…”
Section: Legislative Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, authors present experiences to achieve interoperability at semantic level [9,10] and successful experiences consuming and producing linked open data [11]. Authors of previous studies [1215] have studied the use of metadata to describe e-Government services in Web Pages, using different annotation technologies as microformats, microdata [16], RDFa [17] or JSON-LD [18], but not associated with data exchanges, but associated with pages published in websites. In the case of social security information systems, metadata should describe data involved in information exchanges between social security institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%