2020
DOI: 10.7249/rra365-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Privacy During Pandemics: A Scorecard Approach for Evaluating the Privacy Implications of COVID-19 Mobile Phone Surveillance Programs

Abstract: Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time limits means ensuring that the data obtained about contacts, location tracking, and mobile device proximity can only be used in the scope of the crisis. Data management means applying all protections measures throughout the life cycle of data-collection systems for contact-tracing mobile apps ( Boudreaux et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time limits means ensuring that the data obtained about contacts, location tracking, and mobile device proximity can only be used in the scope of the crisis. Data management means applying all protections measures throughout the life cycle of data-collection systems for contact-tracing mobile apps ( Boudreaux et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longterm concerns center around the ambiguous end point for data collection and concerns that once allowed in order to mitigate a temporary emergency, surveillance will become permanent. Unfortunately, these concerns are warranted based on the history of previous surveillance activities enacted during crises: In the United States, there have been over 30 national emergencies declared providing emergency powers, including the domestic and international surveillance activities put in place after the September 11 terrorist attacks [75]. Balancing the clear long-term societal benefit of technologies to manage critical infection spread and reduce deaths and health-care costs, with short-term risks of disclosing sensitive personal information and long-term risks of continuous health surveillance, illustrates the ethical tensions of crisis contexts.…”
Section: Beneficencementioning
confidence: 99%