Data Quality Evaluation for Program Evaluators

Henson, Harold A

doi:10.3138/cjpe.261

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Others explain multidisciplinary teams as favourable, for it helped them choose guiding substantive theories. 69 Presently, a team with varied expertise will be valuable for uncovering different theories present in participant accounts that would have been missed otherwise. Second, a patient-driven approach will be taken by including a programme client on the evaluation team.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Information regarding five indicators of administrative data quality outlined by Henson will be recorded in order to be transparent about the data from Sanctum V.1.0 records: completeness, timeliness, valid representativeness, consistency and integrity. 69 Data quality will be commented on when the findings are reported. Once qualitative data are transcribed, the interviewer will scan the transcript for accuracy.…”

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding the impact of a residential housing programme for people living with HIV/AIDS: a realist evaluation protocol

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionHousing instability and homelessness are significant barriers to medical treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. For these individuals, lack of stable housing and stigma is associated with insufficient access to care, poor adherence to medication and higher cost burdens to the healthcare system. This protocol reports on the efforts to evaluate Sanctum V.1.0, a hospice and transitional care home for adults with HIV/AIDS in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. The current project was developed out of a need to identify how Sanctum V.1.0 produces varying programme outcomes to assist in endeavours to replicate the programme in other geographic locations.Methods and analysisA realist evaluation will be conducted to explore how and why Sanctum V.1.0 is successful or unsuccessful, in which circumstances and for whom. Rather than explore the degree to which a programme is effective, realist evaluations seek to uncover mechanisms that explain processual links between programme inputs and outcomes. The completed first phase of the project involved the development of an initial realist programme theory. Phases 2 and 3 will consist of methods to test, refine and validate the initial theory using various data sources.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the institutional review board at the University of Saskatchewan on 2 July 2020. Results will be disseminated according to stakeholders’ desires.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%