1992
DOI: 10.1177/073490419201000604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Reduction of Room Tests for Zone Model Validation

Abstract: Compartment fire zone models are based on many simplifying assumptions, in particular that gases stratify in two distinct layers. Because of these assumptions, certain model output is in a form unsuitable for direct comparison to measurements made in full-scale room tests. The experimental data must first be reduced and transformed to be compatible with the model output. In this article, new techniques are described to calculate neutral plane height, vent flow rates, uniform upper and lower layer temperature a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Wall A. Twelve thermocouples were installed in three thermocouple trees to measure the temperature at 30 cm from the wall A (sensors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as can be observed in Figure 2c. These measurements are used to study the smoke temperature at the far field and the smoke layer drop.…”
Section: Fire Experiments and Simulations In A Full-scale Atrium 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Wall A. Twelve thermocouples were installed in three thermocouple trees to measure the temperature at 30 cm from the wall A (sensors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as can be observed in Figure 2c. These measurements are used to study the smoke temperature at the far field and the smoke layer drop.…”
Section: Fire Experiments and Simulations In A Full-scale Atrium 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually evaluated in the literature by means of CO 2 concentration [16,17] as well as temperature measurements [18][19][20][21][22], the latter being the most used due to the ease of its measurement. There are many different temperature methods to evaluate the smoke layer interface in the literature, such as the n-percent method proposed by Cooper et al [18], the upper zone averaging and mass equivalency by Quintere et al [19], the maximum gradient method by Emmons [20], the Janssen method [21] or the least-square method by He et al [22]. All these methods, except the least-square method, present a certain grade of empiricism, because of that the least-square method has been used in this paper to compare the smoke layer interface both numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about this phenomenon will be addressed in the next section since it is a consequence of the previously established steady-state stage. The smoke layer interface and the layer temperatures have been numerically calculated in FDS using the method developed in [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 and the calculated mass flow with FDS is provided in Table 2. The hot layer height and average hot layer temperature have been recorded in the opening with the help of the "layer height" and "upper temperature" functions in FDS, which are based on the two-layer reduction method [16,21]. There are fundamental differences between the calculation procedure of FDS and the assumptions of Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Data From Fdsmentioning
confidence: 99%