2016
DOI: 10.2204/iodp.proc.320321.219.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data report: a revised biomagnetostratigraphic age model for Site U1338, IODP Expedition 320/321

Abstract: The development of late middle Miocene through recent sedimentation rates was determined for Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Site U1338 in the eastern equatorial Pacific using available geomagnetic chron boundaries and biostratigraphic biohorizons provided by calcareous nannofossils and diatoms. These data were set in a revised depth splice of the three holes at Site U1338 and provide a lower resolution image of the sedimentation rate history in the region of Site U1338 through relatively long linear interpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we were unable to reconstruct these changes prior to 16 Ma, since the onset and early phase of the MCO are not identifiable at Site U1338. This interval at Site U1338 is within the slowly sedimented, basal sedimentary succession, which was poorly recovered [ Backman et al ., ]. Taking into account uncertainties in paleobathymetric reconstructions, which could reach ~250 m according to Pälike et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we were unable to reconstruct these changes prior to 16 Ma, since the onset and early phase of the MCO are not identifiable at Site U1338. This interval at Site U1338 is within the slowly sedimented, basal sedimentary succession, which was poorly recovered [ Backman et al ., ]. Taking into account uncertainties in paleobathymetric reconstructions, which could reach ~250 m according to Pälike et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have, therefore, chosen to present the abundance data v. depth rather than age, as age estimates inevitably will change when an improved age model based on astronomical tuning of various sediment properties becomes established. However, when summarizing relative abundances of the major Discoaster groups, we have placed these data on a low-resolution age model for Site U1338 (Backman et al 2016), using a combination of seven biomagnetostratigraphic indicators from 5.04 Ma/68.63 m to 17.74 Ma/406.43 m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above, the abundance patterns of discoasters are plotted v. depth. When summarizing the key trends among these patterns, we consider it useful to plot the data v. age using a low-resolution age model of Site U1338 (Backman et al 2016). Discoasters reveal distinct traits over the late early Miocene through late Miocene interval at Site U1338 (Figs 11 and 12).…”
Section: Major Traits Of Miocene Discoasters At Iodp Site U1338mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recalculated the age models for ODP 717 and 718 to reflect updated biostratigraphic and geochronologic constraints (Figures S1 and S2; supporting information S1.1). The original biohorizons for Sites 717 and 718 (Gartner, 1990;Shipboard_Scientific_Party, 1988a, 1988b were updated with revised calcareous nannnofossil and planktonic foraminifera biohorizon ages (Backman, et al, 2012;Wade et al, 2011) and updated ages for the Top common Cyclicargolithus floridanus and Base Discoaster exilis horizons (Backman et al, 2016;Ciummelli et al, 2017;McNeill et al, 2017;Pälike et al, 2010). The most important changes are the updated age for the Base Nicklithus amplificus horizon (shifted from 5.9 to 6.…”
Section: Samples and Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%