2006
DOI: 10.3233/ies-2006-0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data reproducibility of an inertial resistance exercise device suggested for use during space travel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared with intratrial results, the Table's intertrial data demonstrate more variability. This effect was noted in other studies (9,10) and was attributed in part to the longer length of time between trials that provided the paired data. In addition, a lack of familiarity with the IKE may have also lowered current intertrial reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As compared with intratrial results, the Table's intertrial data demonstrate more variability. This effect was noted in other studies (9,10) and was attributed in part to the longer length of time between trials that provided the paired data. In addition, a lack of familiarity with the IKE may have also lowered current intertrial reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Yet current smallest real difference results compare favorably with those from 2 recent studies that also employed nongravity-dependent resistive exercise devices (9,10). Smallest real difference results ranged from 12 to 850 for workout data obtained from the non-gravity-dependent high-speed device (9) and 4 to 94 for the low-speed apparatus (10). Current smallest real difference results even show less variability than non-exercise research, such as data derived from stroke patients (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations