Data’s Impact on Algorithmic Bias

Shin, Dong‐Hee; Shin, Emily Y.

doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3262909

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The primary cause for undermining decision-maker neutrality is algorithms' discriminating characteristics [29]. The motivations for algorithmic discrimination stem from human beings, and designers integrate value notions into the algorithmic design, embedding them into public behaviour and consciousness [30]. Detecting discriminatory ideas might be challenging.…”

Section: Theory Of Digital Procedural Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Digital trade disputes stem from frequent transactions in digital trade. Digital trade disputes may occur in 3-5% of digital trade transactions, which is a considerable proportion [30]. According to data from the United States Conference on Commerce and Development, the global digitally ordered trade amounted to USD 26.7 trillion in 2019 and is projected to grow by 60% from 53% in 2021 [44].…”

Section: Characteristics Of Digital Trade Disputesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Innovation Helps with Sustainable Business, Law, and Digital Technologies: Economic Development and Dispute Resolution

Wang,

Li,

Khaskheli

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses the dispute resolution procedure that innovative digital commerce has adopted for the future for sustainable business. As digital trade becomes increasingly important for economic growth, trade-related disputes must be settled in both business and consumer situations. This study examines the advantages of using digital technology to resolve disputes involving digital trade and discusses how digital technology is changing traditional dispute resolution procedures. Conventional trade disputes differ from their digital counterparts because the digital sphere gives rise to more complex trade conflicts that require stronger regulatory resources. The utilization of digital technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, innovation-based models, digital strategies, and others can enhance the efficacy of conflict resolution. Digital technology can assist in resolving disputes with digital trade, even though procedural fairness issues including prejudice and algorithmic opacity may also arise. The research highlights the importance of developing innovative techniques to set up trade dispute resolution procedures and building legal frameworks for jurisdiction, trial, and enforcement procedures in addition to stressing the usage of digital technology.

show abstract

Section: Theory Of Digital Procedural Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Digital Trade Disputesmentioning

confidence: 99%