2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: technical, social and ethical issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the samples stored in the past without informed consent, in accordance with ESHG (European Society of Human Genetics) document [12], they are used in an identifiable manner guaranteeing confidentiality according to the rules of professional deontology and existing regulations, without the obligation to render the samples anonymous, in order to be able to make any diagnosis and/or important result available to biological patients’ family members.…”
Section: Ethical Legal and Social Issues (Elsi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the samples stored in the past without informed consent, in accordance with ESHG (European Society of Human Genetics) document [12], they are used in an identifiable manner guaranteeing confidentiality according to the rules of professional deontology and existing regulations, without the obligation to render the samples anonymous, in order to be able to make any diagnosis and/or important result available to biological patients’ family members.…”
Section: Ethical Legal and Social Issues (Elsi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The informed consent taken at that time did not contemplate genetic studies. Many commentators criticized the plan to set up biobanks arguing that a conventional readings of key research ethics governance instruments (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences 2002; World Medical Association 2013) prohibited the use of stored samples when intended uses were not foreseen at the time participants had given consent unless every participant was recontacted and agreed to the new uses (Ayme 2003). Unfortunately, recontacting is not a viable option because many of the participants have likely died or moved or, if found, could decline to consent to the new uses.…”
Section: The Role Of Experts In Solving Regulatory Obstacles and Negamentioning
confidence: 99%