Dataset for: Identifying children with self-regulation problems: factorial structure and psychometric properties of the QUVA-p, a screening tool for preschool teachers.

Scionti, Nicoletta; Luzi, Giulia; Zampini, Laura; Marzocchi, G

doi:10.23668/psycharchives.4789

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If we use inferential tests, we report exact p values, effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals. Open Data: I confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported results, including codebook if relevant (see Scionti et al, 2021b). Open Materials: I confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported methodologies (see Scionti et al, 2021a).…”

Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning

confidence: 88%

Identifying Children With Self-Regulation Problems

Scionti

Luzi

Zampini

et al. 2023

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The Preschool Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Questionario di Valutazione dell’Autoregolazione [QUVA-p]) is a teacher-completed screening tool for assessing child dysregulation at preschool age. This study presents the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, which was investigated in a sample of 413 preschoolers. We tested for construct validity, measurement invariance across gender, subscale internal consistency, subscale convergent validity with executive control tasks (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility), and power to detect child differences in executive control. Results show that the factorial structure of the QUVA-p is in line with Nigg’s theoretical model of self-regulation and the subscales have good reliability. Measurement invariance is maintained across gender; the instrument reveals small but significant associations with executive control tasks, and it could be useful to detect child differences in executive control.

show abstract

Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning

confidence: 88%