2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dataset on the effects of self-confidence, motivation and anxiety on Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate in face-to-face and digital settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of the current also suggest that three items in grit subscale were of the most difficult items to agree. These findings corresponded our early analysis (see Mulyono & Saskia, 2020), showing that the variable "motivation" was marginally reliable, and the variable "grit" subscale had unacceptably low reliability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Findings of the current also suggest that three items in grit subscale were of the most difficult items to agree. These findings corresponded our early analysis (see Mulyono & Saskia, 2020), showing that the variable "motivation" was marginally reliable, and the variable "grit" subscale had unacceptably low reliability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The answers for the scale was designed with five choices, i.e. 1 (Strongly Disagree), 2 (Disagree), 3 (Uncertain), 4 (Agree), and 5 (Strongly Agree) (Mulyono and Saskia, 2020). The question system was assessed using the SWOT analysis, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Khajavy et al, 2019 ; Alrabai, 2022 ; Kruk, 2022 ). Mulyono and Saskia (2020) , in their study, investigated the role of self-confidence, motivation, and anxiety in promoting students’ willingness to communicate in traditional and digital settings. They found motivation as an affective variable that influences learners’ willingness to communicate in both digital and traditional environments.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%