2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-018-0496-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating a Synthetic Character is Like Dating a Man

Abstract: To evaluate our emotionally intelligent software, we put a virtual human capable of speech and facial expressions to an updated and enriched version of the traditional Turing test. In a speed-date with 54 young females, either our software or human confederates controlled the simulation of the virtual human's affective performance. Results were obtained with frequentist analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Indeed, participants did not detect differences and observed similarity in the emotional b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While following this reasoning, in about 20 years' time, we validated the theory (Interactively) Perceiving and Experiencing Fictional Characters for movie characters, media figures, office assistants, game characters, virtual tour guides (Hoorn & Konijn, 2003 (Hoorn, Konijn, & Pontier, 2018), and social robots in various settings (e.g., a robot doctor, a robot grandchild) (Hoorn, Konijn, Germans, Burger, & Munneke, 2015). We found the functions that tell how much the said psychological dimensions suppress or enhance one another, running from ethics and affordances through relevance and valence up to involvement, distance, and use intentions.…”
Section: Psychology and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While following this reasoning, in about 20 years' time, we validated the theory (Interactively) Perceiving and Experiencing Fictional Characters for movie characters, media figures, office assistants, game characters, virtual tour guides (Hoorn & Konijn, 2003 (Hoorn, Konijn, & Pontier, 2018), and social robots in various settings (e.g., a robot doctor, a robot grandchild) (Hoorn, Konijn, Germans, Burger, & Munneke, 2015). We found the functions that tell how much the said psychological dimensions suppress or enhance one another, running from ethics and affordances through relevance and valence up to involvement, distance, and use intentions.…”
Section: Psychology and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If people cannot reject the H0, the agency is just another human being. The alternative explanation is that the observer cannot prove that this one agency actually is a robot, for instance, because it has passed the Turing Test (Hoorn, Konijn, & Pontier, 2018). In an affective reflexive mode, which is fast and imprecise, sensitivity d' decreases (Figure 2).…”
Section: Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remainder of this paper, a brief review of the model is given in Section S1 , together with an attempt to better systematize the use of mathematical language for deployment in the quantum-computing algorithms, presented thereafter.
Figure 1 Dependencies in Silicon Coppélia 32 . Curved arrows indicate interaction effects.
…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%