Encyclopedia of Adolescence 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32132-5_51-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating Abuse: Prevalence, Consequences, and Predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, each of the family and individual variables examined in the current study has been associated with dating violence victimization and/or perpetration in empirical research (Chen et al 2016; Reyes, Foshee, Klevens et al 2016; Vagi et al 2014) and thus are common targets for prevention programs (Reyes, Foshee, and Chen 2016). We expect that higher levels of each risk factor and lower levels of each protective factor will distinguish the expected multiform aggressive victims from the expected psychologically aggressive victim and uninvolved classes and distinguish the expected psychologically aggressive victim class from the uninvolved class.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, each of the family and individual variables examined in the current study has been associated with dating violence victimization and/or perpetration in empirical research (Chen et al 2016; Reyes, Foshee, Klevens et al 2016; Vagi et al 2014) and thus are common targets for prevention programs (Reyes, Foshee, and Chen 2016). We expect that higher levels of each risk factor and lower levels of each protective factor will distinguish the expected multiform aggressive victims from the expected psychologically aggressive victim and uninvolved classes and distinguish the expected psychologically aggressive victim class from the uninvolved class.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Estimates from nationally representative surveys in the U.S. suggest that 10% of high school attending youth have experienced physical and/or sexual dating violence (Kann et al 2014; Haynie et al 2013) and 25% have experienced psychological dating violence in the past 12 months (Haynie et al 2013) with potentially severe negative sequelae including depression, substance use, injury, and, in the most severe cases, death (Chen et al 2016). Although dating violence affects youth in all ethnic and racial groups, research suggests that Latino youth represent a growing population who may be particularly at risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies suggest that involvement in peer and/or dating violence leads to negative outcomes for youth (Arseneault et al 2010; Chen et al 2016; Connolly 2017; Copeland et al 2013; Foshee et al 2016; Nahapetyan et al 2014). However, most extant research on violence outcomes has focused on identifying the unique effects of experiencing a particular type and form of violence (e.g., physical dating violence) victimization or perpetration, thus failing to account for overlap and heterogeneity in the types and forms of violence that youth experience and engage in that may be key to understanding differential risk for negative consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth who are involved in interpersonal violence are at risk for a range of negative developmental outcomes (Arseneault et al 2010; Chen et al 2016; Connolly 2017; Copeland et al 2013; Foshee et al 2016; Nahapetyan et al 2014). For example, longitudinal studies of dating violence have found that victims, compared to non-victims, are at increased risk of substance use, psychological distress, academic decline, physical injuries, and increased suicide attempts (Chen et al 2016). Similar negative outcomes have been found in studies assessing the effects of peer violence victimization (Arseneault et al 2010; Connolly 2017; Copeland et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%