2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating coeval mafic magmatism and ultrahigh temperature metamorphism in the Anápolis–Itauçu Complex, Central Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…650 -640 Ma, suggesting that UHT metamorphism, emplacement of mafic magmas and anatexis were partially coeval (Piuzana et al 2003b, Della Giustina et al 2011. T DM Sm-Nd model ages of orthogranulites fall into two age intervals, between 2.3 -1.9 Ga and 1.7 -1.4 Ga, and ε Nd (T) values are negative, ranging from -9.3 to -1.4 (Piuzana et al 2003a).…”
Section: Anápolis-itauçu Complexmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…650 -640 Ma, suggesting that UHT metamorphism, emplacement of mafic magmas and anatexis were partially coeval (Piuzana et al 2003b, Della Giustina et al 2011. T DM Sm-Nd model ages of orthogranulites fall into two age intervals, between 2.3 -1.9 Ga and 1.7 -1.4 Ga, and ε Nd (T) values are negative, ranging from -9.3 to -1.4 (Piuzana et al 2003a).…”
Section: Anápolis-itauçu Complexmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The ages of these two magmatic systems are still controversial. Ferreira Filho et al (2010), Pimentel et al (2006) and Della Giustina et al (2011) suggest that the western part of the complexes and the associated volcano-sedimentary sequences of Juscelândia, Indaianópolis and Palmeirópolis are mesoproterozoic in age, whereas the eastern part crystallized at ca. 780 Ma.…”
Section: The Barro Alto Niquelândia and Canabrava Mafic-ultramafic Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'clockwise' (orange) vs. 'anticlockwise' (blue) notation is defined on the basis of pressure increasing up the page and temperature increasing from left to right and indicates that PeT path shape is independent of timescale. metamorphism has been classified, ranging from 'short', of the order of approximately <5e40 Myr (Table 2; Schmitz and Bowring, 2003;Baldwin and Brown, 2008;Clark et al, 2009;Leite et al, 2009;Santosh et al, 2009cSantosh et al, , 2012Santosh et al, , 2013Schmitz et al, 2009;Brandt et al, 2011;Cutts et al, 2011a;Galli et al, 2011;Giustina et al, 2011;Jöns and Schenk, 2011;Orejana et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2012;Xiang et al, 2012;Nakano et al, 2013;Bhowmick et al, 2014;; and 'long', of the order of approximately !40 Myr (Baba et al, 2010;Das et al, 2011;Korhonen et al, 2011;Smithies et al, 2011;Drüppel et al, 2013;Korhonen et al, 2013b;Walsh et al, 2014). The timescale of UHT metamorphism for a particular locality/terrane will be dependent on the longevity of the heat source as well as numerous other factors discussed earlier (see section 8) that comprise the total geologic and tectonic system (Brown and Korhonen 2009).…”
Section: Timescales and Geochronometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 Ma; for example, Korhonen, Clark, Brown, Bhattacharya, & Taylor, ; Walsh et al., ) UHT events have been reported. The synthesis presented by Kelsey and Hand () nevertheless highlights that, for a single terrane, the time‐scale of UHT metamorphism interpreted by different authors are widely different (e.g., Anápolis–Itauçu complex, Brazil: Baldwin & Brown, ; compared to Della Giustina, Pimentel, Ferreira Filho, & de Hollanda, ). These complications arise mainly from contrasting interpretations of zircon and monazite U–Pb geochronological data relative to P – T conditions retrieved from metamorphic phase equilibria modelling (Harley, ; Kelsey & Hand, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%