2014
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dative or Not Dative?

Abstract: Is a meatball an animal praline? The authors of the Essay Dative Bonds in Main‐Group Compounds: A Case for Fewer Arrows! respond to the criticism of Gernot Frenking and correct one point in their original Essay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…have been used to describe structures involving main-group compounds. [28] In a very recent essay entitled: "Chemistry: A Panoply of Arrows," Prof.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been used to describe structures involving main-group compounds. [28] In a very recent essay entitled: "Chemistry: A Panoply of Arrows," Prof.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar manner, the synthesis of twofold base adducts of monovalent boron extended this concept to elements beyond carbon 21-24 , and more recently analogous '-ones' of heavier group 14 elements have also been realized 25 . This rethinking of the bonding in main-group compounds in terms of bonding between a Lewis donor and a Lewis acceptor has recently spurred heated debate in the literature [26][27][28] .While earlier reports on carbon suboxide and its cationic nitrogen analogue presume a cumulenic (O 5 C 5 E 5 C 5 O) (where E is C or N) structure 9,10 , Frenking and co-workers have suggested that these compounds might be better considered as Lewis adducts (OCRErCO). In contrast, they predicted that the hypothetical borylene dicarbonyl HB(CO) 2 would contain much more ERCO p backbonding than in the carbon and nitrogen dicarbonyls (when E is boron, p backbonding is 33.8% of the total bonding energy, whereas it is 5.2% and 10.0% for nitrogen and carbon, respectively) 20 , making the boron analogue much more akin to transition-metal bis(CO) counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar manner, the synthesis of twofold base adducts of monovalent boron extended this concept to elements beyond carbon [21][22][23][24] , and more recently analogous '-ones' of heavier group 14 elements have also been realized 25 . This rethinking of the bonding in main-group compounds in terms of bonding between a Lewis donor and a Lewis acceptor has recently spurred heated debate in the literature [26][27][28] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bonding in compound 2a can be described using either zwitterionic (2a) or dative forms (2a') (Scheme 4). Neither model is completely accurate and the debate over which is more appropriate can be a contentious issue [25,26] which we will not delve into here. For the sake of consistency, we will by default refer to and draw the compound as the arsino-phosphonium form, 2a, unless the phosphino-arsenium form is to be discussed specifically.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Arsanylidene-phosphorane 3amentioning
confidence: 98%