Drs Terry and Bradbury developed the ideas and jointly wrote this commentary; and all authors approved the fi nal manuscript as submitted.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:The authors have indicated they have no potential confl icts of interest to disclose.Family history is 1 of the strongest predictors of most cancers. 1 Yet primary cancer prevention efforts are often not targeted toward individuals at greatest risk. This contrasts with a growing practice of targeting secondary prevention efforts and screening guidelines to those at greatest risk. The lack of targeted primary prevention behavioral interventions likely reflects the reality that all individuals are susceptible to cancer regardless of their family history and that most, if not all, individuals can substantially benefit from reducing cancer risk factors (eg, smoking, lack of physical activity, unhealthy diets, excessive weight gain) for optimal health and to lower chronic disease burden generally. We suspect, however, that another reason why cancer prevention efforts are not targeted toward those at highest risk is because of the lack of awareness that those at highest risk can benefit from cancer prevention interventions that target modifiable factors, and that their risk is not solely from genes. Using the example of breast cancer, we highlight the limited but growing evidence that even in women at highest risk, modifiable factors still contribute to cancer risk. We then discuss the benefits of considering family-based approaches to complement existing population approaches to cancer prevention.Growing evidence suggests that many of the modifiable risk factors that increase breast cancer also do so in those with a family history of breast cancer. For example, even in women at the highest risk of breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, age of onset has been shown to be delayed for girls engaged in adolescent physical activity compared with more inactive girls, 2 and breast cancer risk has been associated with risk in carriers who smoked compared with those who do not. 3 Even within families that have strong family histories, sisters with breast cancer differ from their unaffected sisters in a number of biomarkers that are associated with environmental changes throughout life including markers of DNA repair phenotype, DNA methylation levels, and oxidative stress markers (as reviewed in Terry et al 1 ). The American Cancer Society (ACS) suggests that all women engage in weekly physical activity of 150 minutes of moderate physical activity, drink fewer than 7 alcoholic beverages per week, and maintain a BMI of <25. When we examined whether adherence to these ACS guidelines was also relevant to high risk women in a familybased cohort, we observed that adherence to ACS guidelines was associated with a 40% lower by guest on May 11, 2018 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ Downloaded from