David Pearce and the economic valuation of biodiversity

Abstract

David Pearce was a pioneer in the economic valuation of biodiversity. His work powerfully influenced both later economists who worked in the field and natural scientists and practitioners who gained and appreciation of the importance of economics to their efforts. Pearce often applied the paradigm of demonstration followed by appropriation: the values of biodiversity must first be demonstrated to those who make decisions concerning its survival, and then appropriated by them. The later step will be possible when market and policy failures are rectified so as to allow the realization of conservation values. While Pearce wrote extensively on these themes, he was also acutely aware of the limitations of the paradigm. Rosy projections of values that could not be realized and appropriated would be of little practical use, and Pearce often cautioned against excesses of optimism. Yet he also clearly believed that there are compelling, if not always easily demonstrated, reasons for conservation. I argue in this paper that Pearce’s seminal work on the valuation of biodiversity cannot be understood without some appreciation of his philosophical perspective. Pearce would have described himself as a pragmatist. However, his pragmatism was grounded in the belief that it is both expedient and ethical to recognize that communities in some of the poorest corners of the world will only conserve biodiversity if they are justly compensated for the sacrifices they must make to do so. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007Biodiversity, Valuation, Stated preference, Ethics, Development, Market failure, Policy failure, Appropriation,

Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Biodiversity Risk in the US: A Spatial Econometric Approach

“…Broad categories of service flows include: provisioning (e.g., food, fiber, and pharmaceuticals); regulating (flood control, disease control and water purification); and cultural (aesthetic, spiritual, and recreational) [1]. Social and economic systems interact and affect biodiversity through landscapes (e.g., from degraded habitats to protected wilderness areas, and watersheds for urban water supplies), myriad production and consumption choices [6,7], the laws we enact (e.g., the US Endangered Species Act [8], and the international Convention on Biodiversity [3]), and the values we hold (e.g., amenity, option and existence values for species protection) [9,10].…”

Estimating the Costs of Protecting Native Species from Invasive Animal Pests in New South Wales, Australia

“…Simpson (2007) begins his review of Pearce's work in this area by emphasising the importance of this process. To be accepted and applied, the values must be defensible, supportable and believable.…”

“…"Decline in biodiversity includes all those changes that have to do with reducing or simplifying biological heterogeneity" (Pearce and Moran 1994, p. 1). In a discussion of Pearce's contributions in this area, Simpson (2007) reviews the application of this basic concept and suggests that use has made it too elastic.…”

Making a difference — how environmental economists can influence the policy process — a case study of David W Pearce

“…18 Kenneth Ruffing, OECD, Personal communication, 11 May, 2006. 19 See, for example, the papers by Simpson (2007) and Eichner and Pethig (2007) in this volume. in its potential.…”