2017
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2016.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dawes Review 7: The Tidal Downsizing Hypothesis of Planet Formation

Abstract: Tidal Downsizing scenario of planet formation builds on ideas proposed by Gerard Kuiper in 1951. Detailed simulations of self-gravitating discs, gas fragments, dust grain dynamics, and planet evolutionary calculations are summarised here and used to build a predictive population synthesis. A new interpretation of exoplanetary and debris disc data, the Solar System's origins, and the links between planets and brown dwarfs is offered. Tidal Downsizing predicts that presence of debris discs, sub-Neptune mass plan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 274 publications
(814 reference statements)
2
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be argued that this approach, which does not rely on unknown or improperly modeled physics, is less prone to bias the estimation of the planet frequency. However, it puts an equal statistical weight on planets at all masses and separations, which is in contradiction with all models of planet formation, either based on CA (Mordasini et al 2009;Ida & Lin 2004;Ida et al 2013) or GI (Forgan & Rice 2013;Forgan et al 2015;Nayakshin 2017), which all agree that the formation of very massive companions at large orbital separation occurs much less frequently than less massive, closer-in planets. Although based on models, this information is important to take into account prior to the analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be argued that this approach, which does not rely on unknown or improperly modeled physics, is less prone to bias the estimation of the planet frequency. However, it puts an equal statistical weight on planets at all masses and separations, which is in contradiction with all models of planet formation, either based on CA (Mordasini et al 2009;Ida & Lin 2004;Ida et al 2013) or GI (Forgan & Rice 2013;Forgan et al 2015;Nayakshin 2017), which all agree that the formation of very massive companions at large orbital separation occurs much less frequently than less massive, closer-in planets. Although based on models, this information is important to take into account prior to the analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…If the contraction of the fragment is slow enough, and the migration and sedimentation fast enough, then the fragment may be stripped of gas by tidal interactions with the host star and this process could in principle form both close-in, and wide orbit, planets (Nayakshin 2017).…”
Section: Planet Population Synthesis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand the diversity of planetary composition in this size regime, a larger sample of exoplanets with well-constrained mass and radius is needed. A better insight into planetary composition will also make it possible to constrain planetary formation processes, since the two alternative planetary formation theories, namely core accretion (Lissauer 1993) and gravitational instability models (Nayakshin 2017), predict different metal-gas ratio compositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If clumps do not accrete gas and contract slowly, then they are tidally disrupted (Boley et al 2010;Nayakshin 2010a) after they migrate too close to the host star, leaving behind a solid core (if grain sedimentation within the clump was sufficiently rapid; see Boss 1997;Helled & Schubert 2008;Helled, Podolak & Kovetz 2008;Nayakshin 2011). This channel of clump evolution is the base for the tidal downsizing scenario of planet formation (see the recent review in Nayakshin 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%