1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6532(98)00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Day surgery admissions and complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall unplanned admission rate of 2% in this report is at the lower range of the reported series [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and complies with the recommendation of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 15 These admissions were mainly a result of minor postoperative events and no serious consequence was noted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The overall unplanned admission rate of 2% in this report is at the lower range of the reported series [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and complies with the recommendation of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 15 These admissions were mainly a result of minor postoperative events and no serious consequence was noted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…6 In many reported series, the commonest cause of unplanned admission was due to surgical reasons of which pain, haemorrhage, infection and extended surgery were frequently quoted. 6,10,[12][13][14] The present report has an unusually high percentage of admissions caused by extended operations. This might reflect the inaccuracy of preoperative diagnosis by the referring surgeons or their lack of understanding on the selection criteria for day case surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed few research studies have attempted to seek the patient's perspective, with many failing to trace the history of pain experience. Consequently, more follow‐up studies on patients’ pain have been recommended (Linden & Bergbom‐Engberg 1996, Ogg et al. 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%