2008
DOI: 10.1080/14786450802318426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daylight simulations and tubular light guides

Abstract: Indoor visual comfort is one of the leading requirements for building design. Results of computer daylight simulations serve to optimise the design process. Computer programs Ecotect and Radiance were used for the simulation of daylighting from tubular light guides of various diameters and lengths. The internal illuminance calculations were compared for two extreme situations in boundary conditions -sunny summer sky and winter overcast sky, determined for the climatic region of Central Europe. Daylight simulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, modeling complicated curved and specular surfaces using the Radiance model's original formulation is difficult or impossible due to backward raytracing and geometrical issues [28]. Although large-diameter light pipes are still handled successfully [98], thin light pipes and optic fiber are best described using the photon map approach [99]. It makes sense to assume that, as of this writing, additional initiatives are being taken to enhance the Radiance model and offer a trustworthy approach to emulating these components.…”
Section: Standard Comparison Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, modeling complicated curved and specular surfaces using the Radiance model's original formulation is difficult or impossible due to backward raytracing and geometrical issues [28]. Although large-diameter light pipes are still handled successfully [98], thin light pipes and optic fiber are best described using the photon map approach [99]. It makes sense to assume that, as of this writing, additional initiatives are being taken to enhance the Radiance model and offer a trustworthy approach to emulating these components.…”
Section: Standard Comparison Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bended light pipes have been studied for both direct and diffuse light concluding that for the angled entrance part, accumulated yearly light output was higher than for the straight pipes due to the larger sun-facing area [100], but bends in pipes body inside the building should be avoided due to the increasing number of interreflections and decreasing efficiency [83,101,102]. Many theoretical and experimental studies addressed different pipe configurations aiming to find calculation models [103,95,[104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111], resulting in more information on weather and design parameter dependence. Vertical light pipes give high and excessive luminous output when Sun's altitude and azimuth are nearly axillary and beam light propagates with minimal interreflections, while diffuse skylight gives uniform luminance with homogenous output during the daylight hours.…”
Section: Vertical Sun Pipesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light pipes however, are expensive, requires maintenance [61] and the performance can be constrained by overcast sky conditions and changeable solar altitudes. Despite light pipes cannot be properly used to substitute windows due to changeable weather conditions, the light pipes can present electricity energy saving alternatives for permanent artificial lighted rooms in buildings, such as, in windowless zones [142].…”
Section: Innovative Daylighting Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%