2000
DOI: 10.1177/096032710003200311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daylighting museum galleries: a review of performance criteria

Abstract: Conservation-based restrictions on light levels and cumulative exposure in museum galleries are now well established. These have resulted in restrictions on the use of daylight and prolonged development of systems to deliver and control its admittance. Attempts to control daylight and deliver fixed illuminance levels have proved difficult to sustain. Recent installations, in the 1980s and 1990s, have become reliant on a proportion of electric lighting during most opening hours and an acceptance of limited dayl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CannonBrookes pointed out how difficult it was to gauge how well daylit galleries perform while meeting conservation standards. 69 A selection of galleries (including the National Gallery and the Tate Gallery in London) had developed technological solutions to maintaining a constant level of daylight illuminance on the vertical display surface. He suggested thatbecause meeting conservation targets does not guarantee good viewing conditions-the relationship between the two needed to be re-established and an annotated checklist of criteria (Table 1) was provided to assist in developing strategies for daylit galleries.…”
Section: Visualising Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CannonBrookes pointed out how difficult it was to gauge how well daylit galleries perform while meeting conservation standards. 69 A selection of galleries (including the National Gallery and the Tate Gallery in London) had developed technological solutions to maintaining a constant level of daylight illuminance on the vertical display surface. He suggested thatbecause meeting conservation targets does not guarantee good viewing conditions-the relationship between the two needed to be re-established and an annotated checklist of criteria (Table 1) was provided to assist in developing strategies for daylit galleries.…”
Section: Visualising Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls strategies could be applied to museums and galleries as well. Cannon-Brookes 40 pointed out how difficult it was to gauge how well daylit galleries perform while meeting conservation standards. A selection of galleries (including the National Gallery and the Tate Gallery in London) had developed technological solutions to maintaining a constant level of daylight illuminance on the vertical display surface.…”
Section: Visualising Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific literature concerning museum lighting frequently analyzes technical aspects such as the visibility of paintings, suitable luminaire arrangements, conservational issues, or correct color rendering (Cannon-Brookes 2000;Cuttle 1996;Rawson-Bottom and Harris 1958). The analyses partly reference the problem in that they analyze a single work of art or dissimilar artworks or sections of a painting or reference a specific painting technique or certain period, but a generalization with several artworks and differing painting techniques is usually not available in practice.…”
Section: Methods For Differentiating Between Light Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%