2011
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-29-2189-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dayside and nightside contributions to cross-polar cap potential variations: the 20 March 2001 ICME case

Abstract: Abstract. We investigate the association between temporalspatial structure of polar cap convection and auroral electrojet intensifications during a 5-h-long interval of strong forcing of the magnetosphere by an ICME/Magnetic cloud on 20 March 2001. We use data from coordinated ground-satellite observations in the 15:00-20:00 MLT sector. We take advantage of the good latitudinal coverage in the polar cap and in the auroral zone of the IMAGE chain of ground magnetometers in Svalbard -Scandinavia -Russia and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that this flow event is observed at the time of PBI/streamer activity in the same MLT sector in the Northern (summer) Hemisphere. This is an interesting observation which is consistent with the ideas and observations of Andalsvik et al (2011Andalsvik et al ( , 2012, but the relationship between these polar cap flow channel events and substorm activity (substorm onset, PBIs, streamers, and BBFs) is still uncertain and needs further documentation (see e.g., Lyons et al, 2012). Figure 1 shows interplanetary (IP) data from spacecraft Wind during passage of an ICME on 30 May 2005.…”
Section: P E Sandholt Et Alsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We point out that this flow event is observed at the time of PBI/streamer activity in the same MLT sector in the Northern (summer) Hemisphere. This is an interesting observation which is consistent with the ideas and observations of Andalsvik et al (2011Andalsvik et al ( , 2012, but the relationship between these polar cap flow channel events and substorm activity (substorm onset, PBIs, streamers, and BBFs) is still uncertain and needs further documentation (see e.g., Lyons et al, 2012). Figure 1 shows interplanetary (IP) data from spacecraft Wind during passage of an ICME on 30 May 2005.…”
Section: P E Sandholt Et Alsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…During winter conditions, when large conductivity gradients are present at the polar cap boundary, the condition of enhanced antisunward convection in the night sector of the polar cap is expected to give rise to flow channel FC 3 (see Andalsvik et al, 2011, their Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, during the expansion phase of certain substorm activities, including the category we discuss in this paper (see e.g. Cai et al, 2006;Henderson et al, 2006;and Andalsvik et al, 2011), the WEJ and the Harang reversal boundary expand westward across the 18:00 MLT meridian (Andalsvik et al, 2011), as we shall also demonstrate below. According to Nielsen and Greenwald (1979) the Harang discontinuity (our Harang reversal boundary) tended to be observed by the Stare radar in the 21:00-24:00 MLT sector, but it was observed as early as 18:30 MLT under very disturbed conditions.…”
Section: P E Sandholt Et Al: Repetitive Substorm Activity Driven Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UT interval we study is determined by the fact that the IMAGE chain of magnetometers typically enter the Harang region at ∼ 14:30-16:00 UT (∼ 17:00-18:00 MLT) under the strong solar wind forcing conditions we study (Andalsvik et al, 2011Sandholt et al, 2012).…”
Section: P E Sandholt Et Al: Repetitive Substorm Activity Driven Bmentioning
confidence: 99%