2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98443-8_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DBpedia and YAGO Based System for Answering Questions in Natural Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the growing interest in semantic resources, several recent approaches have been proposed for semantically analysing user queries and matching them at a semantics-based level to their related documents. However, these approaches either use a single semantic resource such as Lu et al (2015), , Han et al (2016), Selmi et al (2018), Boiński et al (2018) and Royo et al (2005) or multiple heterogeneous semantic resources such as Maree et al (2016), Vigneshwari and Aramudhan (2015), Shen and Lee (2018), Kmail et al (2015), Zhu and Iglesias (2018), Goldfarb and Le Franc (2017) and Wimalasuriya and Dou (2009). For instance, the system proposed in Royo et al (2005) maps query keywords to their corresponding synsets in WordNet ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the growing interest in semantic resources, several recent approaches have been proposed for semantically analysing user queries and matching them at a semantics-based level to their related documents. However, these approaches either use a single semantic resource such as Lu et al (2015), , Han et al (2016), Selmi et al (2018), Boiński et al (2018) and Royo et al (2005) or multiple heterogeneous semantic resources such as Maree et al (2016), Vigneshwari and Aramudhan (2015), Shen and Lee (2018), Kmail et al (2015), Zhu and Iglesias (2018), Goldfarb and Le Franc (2017) and Wimalasuriya and Dou (2009). For instance, the system proposed in Royo et al (2005) maps query keywords to their corresponding synsets in WordNet ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As acknowledged by the authors, exploiting WordNet only is not sufficient and therefore they planned to combine additional ontologies to maximise the depth and breadth of domain coverage. Similarly, the systems proposed in Lu et al (2015), Han et al (2016), Selmi et al (2018), Boiński et al (2018) and Royo et al (2005) exploited single ontologies such as FrameNet, VerbNet and MESH to tackle the issue of semantically interpreting user queries and match them to their relevant documents. However, as reported in Maree and Belkhatir (2015), the domain coverage of these ontologies is limited and is not frequently updated; leading to significantly degrading the quality of the produced results by such systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the development of artificial intelligence is associated with machine learning [20], neural networks [21], evolutionary computing [22], image recognition [23], natural language processing [24,25], and robotics [26,27]. Moreover, a new multidisciplinary paradigm has been introduced, namely Ambient Intelligence (AmI), combining Norman's so-called Invisible Computer and Ubiquitous Computing [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%