2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DC-Evoked Modulation of Excitability of Myelinated Nerve Fibers and Their Terminal Branches; Differences in Sustained Effects of DC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the level of the dorsal roots, the after‐effects were only marginal after 0.5–1 min of the conditioning nerve stimulation (30 or 60 Tib stimuli) but they became statistically significant following the subsequent 2 min period, that is, after 180 Tib stimuli at 1 Hz (Figure a). The increases in nerve volleys evoked by DR stimulation outlasting the conditioning peripheral nerve stimulation were comparable to those outlasting DC administration (Figure c), but both were of shorter duration than the post‐conditioning facilitation of effects of stimulation of the dorsal columns (Figure f) found using the same experimental procedures (Bączyk & Jankowska, ; Kaczmarek & Jankowska, ). We failed, on the other hand, to find post‐conditioning effects of 5 ms current pulses (Figure b) that would replicate effects of such pulses on the excitability of nerve fibres stimulated within the dorsal columns (Figure e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the level of the dorsal roots, the after‐effects were only marginal after 0.5–1 min of the conditioning nerve stimulation (30 or 60 Tib stimuli) but they became statistically significant following the subsequent 2 min period, that is, after 180 Tib stimuli at 1 Hz (Figure a). The increases in nerve volleys evoked by DR stimulation outlasting the conditioning peripheral nerve stimulation were comparable to those outlasting DC administration (Figure c), but both were of shorter duration than the post‐conditioning facilitation of effects of stimulation of the dorsal columns (Figure f) found using the same experimental procedures (Bączyk & Jankowska, ; Kaczmarek & Jankowska, ). We failed, on the other hand, to find post‐conditioning effects of 5 ms current pulses (Figure b) that would replicate effects of such pulses on the excitability of nerve fibres stimulated within the dorsal columns (Figure e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…(d–f) Increases in the excitability of epidurally stimulated nerve fibres found using similar experimental paradigms (replotted data from figs. 3 and 6 in (Bączyk & Jankowska, ; Kaczmarek & Jankowska, ). (g and h) Maximal increases in the excitability of fibres in the sciatic nerve during and after Tib stimulation (unpublished single series of data from (Bolzoni et al., ) as compared with those during and after DC administration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in motoneuron threshold and firing properties are not restricted to the period coinciding with current application and can be observed for at least 15 min after the current offset (Bączyk, Drzymała‐Celichowska, Mrówczyński, & Krutki, ). Moreover, tsDCS effects appear to depend on the current orientation (Bączyk et al, ; Kaczmarek & Jankowska, ) and the effects of anodal polarization (when the active electrode is positive) and cathodal polarization (when the active electrode is negative) on intrinsic excitability and nerve fibre activity of motoneurons appear to differ without being exactly opposite (Bączyk et al, ; Bolzoni & Jankowska, ; Kaczmarek & Jankowska, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the effects of conditioning stimuli were long-lasting, this often restricted the analysis to one sequence of recordings in the individual rat. Two or three sequences were used only when the effects of the epidural polarizing pulses on peripherally recorded nerve fibers were analyzed, because effects of such pulses are evoked within a radius of Ͻ1 mm (Jankowska et al 2017;Kaczmarek and Jankowska 2018). The subsequently explored regions of the spinal cord were at least 2-3 mm apart, and the results from each of these regions were, therefore, considered as independent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity-independent effects of polarizing current pulses. The mechanisms behind sustained effects of DC on fiber excitability remain to be defined, and only some of the questions concerning these mechanisms have so far been addressed (see Jankowska et al 2016 andJankowska 2018). One of these was whether the facilitation depends exclusively on the fiber polarization or whether it requires a concomitant activation of the fibers to take effect.…”
Section: Effects Of Intermittent Epidurally Applied DC Cathodal Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%