2018
DOI: 10.3390/electronics7110306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DDS: A Delay-Constrained Duty-Cycle Scheduling Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Since sensor nodes usually have a large duty cycle interval to prolong network lifetime, duty-cycled wireless sensor networks (WSNs) can suffer from a long end-to-end (E2E) delay. Because delay-sensitive applications have a certain E2E delay requirement, a lot of studies have tried to tackle the long E2E delay problem. However, most existing studies focused on simply reducing the E2E delay rather than considering the delay bound requirement, which makes it hard to achieve balanced performance between E2E delay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dao et al [20] introduced a scheme called Deadline Aware Scheduling and Forwarding (DASF) scheme and Vu et al [21] proposed a scheduling scheme called Delay constraint Duty-cycled Scheduling (DDS), both aim to reduce end-to-end delay and energy consumption in a duty-cycled WSN. These two methods, i.e., DASF and DDS, use the central limit theorem for determining the delay distributions of each group of nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dao et al [20] introduced a scheme called Deadline Aware Scheduling and Forwarding (DASF) scheme and Vu et al [21] proposed a scheduling scheme called Delay constraint Duty-cycled Scheduling (DDS), both aim to reduce end-to-end delay and energy consumption in a duty-cycled WSN. These two methods, i.e., DASF and DDS, use the central limit theorem for determining the delay distributions of each group of nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance metrics as probability density function, state estimation error, energy consumption, goodput, duty cycle, sleep scheduling, number of alive nodes, throughput and delay are analyzed for the proposed method and are validated with other similar state-of-the-art techniques which inhibits the approaches like clustering, duty cycle scheduling, and cross-layer optimization i.e., LEACH [16], DEEC [10], SEP [11], Greedy routing [15], CL-CFMPR [3], FMRP [12], DASF [20], CDSWS [13], DDS [21], GCKN [14], X-MAC [6], PB-MAC [7], and RMS [22]. The probability density function for the RCKF method is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume a network with N nodes, where all of them operate under the duty-cycled asynchronous Low Power Listening (LPL) modes [29]. Each sensor only has two possible working states: the active state, in which the sensor can perform all the functions of sensing, listening, transmitting, and receiving; and the dormant state, in which the sensor turns off all the functional modules except for a wake-up timer.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Description A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%