2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DE-Ada*: A novel model for breast mass classification using cross-modal pathological semantic mining and organic integration of multi-feature fusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed finegrained feature selection idea is effective. Fourth, the RCA model obtains a suboptimal Acc (87.07%), which is close to the DE-Ada * model [46] (87.93%). From the AUC perspective, the RCA model (93%) beats the DE-Ada * model and approaches Shen's single model [26] (95%).…”
Section: B Performance Comparisons With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed finegrained feature selection idea is effective. Fourth, the RCA model obtains a suboptimal Acc (87.07%), which is close to the DE-Ada * model [46] (87.93%). From the AUC perspective, the RCA model (93%) beats the DE-Ada * model and approaches Shen's single model [26] (95%).…”
Section: B Performance Comparisons With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…(4) State-of-the-art breast cancer recognition models were used for direct comparisons: Shen's model [26], Dhungel's model [28], and Zhang's DE-Ada * model [46].…”
Section: ) Benchmark Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As it uses kernel function which maps the feature space into new domain that can easily separate between classes of a dataset. Therefore, it is commonly used with the huge dimension of DL features extracted from CNNs Jadoon et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020;Das et al, 2020;Xue et al, 2016;Leng et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2018;Sampaio et al, 2011) achieving outperforming results. Also, as you can see in Table 1, that SVM is the commonly used in the literature It can be observed that articles that used SVM achieved the highest performance as Khan et al (2020b) which achieved an accuracy of 99.13%, (Khan et al, 2020a) achieving an accuracy of 98.4%, obtaining an accuracy of 95%, (Billah, Waheed & Rahman, 2017) achieving an accuracy of 98.65%…”
Section: Classification Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%