2017
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De‐constructing the co‐construction: Researcher stance, the nature of data and community building in an online participatory platform to create a knowledge repository

Abstract: In this article, we provide a reflexive account of the design of the Body Listening Project, a participatory platform in which participants were invited to engage collectively in the building of a public repository. The Body Listening Project was an online collaborative space, with a designated "ThinkSpace," for participants and moderators to share their experiences of "body listening" and more broadly, self-management of health. The participatory platform on which the study took place was an active, evolving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owens et al [ 10 ], Dyson et al [ 12 ], Greenwood et al [ 14 ], and Han et al [ 15 ] engaged with parents, patients, carers, and other stakeholders to generate research questions for children with special needs, respiratory conditions, and people with diabetes. A total of 4 studies used purpose-built websites [ 10 , 12 , 13 , 15 ], and 3 studies used social media [ 11 , 12 , 14 ]. In addition to their website, Dyson et al [ 12 ] used Facebook and Twitter to work with parents but with limited success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owens et al [ 10 ], Dyson et al [ 12 ], Greenwood et al [ 14 ], and Han et al [ 15 ] engaged with parents, patients, carers, and other stakeholders to generate research questions for children with special needs, respiratory conditions, and people with diabetes. A total of 4 studies used purpose-built websites [ 10 , 12 , 13 , 15 ], and 3 studies used social media [ 11 , 12 , 14 ]. In addition to their website, Dyson et al [ 12 ] used Facebook and Twitter to work with parents but with limited success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%