De la police scientifique à la traçologie

Ribaux, Oliver

doi:10.55430/jbzp2226

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 277 publications

(625 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Baechler et al (2020) proposed a continuous model depicting forensic science's role in case resolution and question answering (shown in Figure 1). A connection between the investigative mindset and forensic science is evident in the comparison of Rossy's model (Ribaux, 2014) with Bull and Blandón‐Gitlin's (2019) three investigation components. Rossy's model illustrates an iterative cycle starting with the event of interest, involving information structuring and hypothesis formulation, while Bull and Blandón‐Gitlin's (2019) components include “information retrieval,” “inference drawing,” and “decision making.”…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fostering an “investigating mindset”: Why is it important in digital forensic science education?

Horsman,

Ryser,

Shavers

2023

WIREs Forensic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of the field of digital forensics (DF) is growing, where digital evidence is increasingly recognized as a crucial part of many investigations. As a result, criminal justice systems rely on DF practitioners to conduct robust investigations of digital devices and their data, and interpret and present these results in a way that can be relied upon. Undertaking this task appropriately requires a practitioner to have a range of skills; however, focus is often placed on the need for and importance of technical competency. Technical skills are vital in this role, that cannot be in dispute; however, this work discusses the need for practitioners to also have an “investigative mindset.”This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fostering an “investigating mindset”: Why is it important in digital forensic science education?

Horsman,

Ryser,

Shavers

2023

WIREs Forensic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Forensic intelligence: Expanding the potential of forensic document examination

Devlin,

Morelato,

Baechler

2024

WIREs Forensic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forensic document examination is characterized by its longevity, diversity, and evolution over time. Predominantly, published research within this field has focused on handwriting examination, the articulation of forensic conclusions, and the development of technical instrumental advancements, focusing on the use of document examination in the resolution of casework. This is a persistent and common problem within forensic science that Kirk identified in 1963 and that other authors have reaffirmed more recently. Ultimately, this has resulted in the potential of forensic intelligence, remaining relatively underexplored in the field of document examination. Forensic intelligence is a different way to view and analyze traces, shifting the focus from the traditional identification of source and activity, to instead identifying trends in criminal activity to assist in the reduction, prevention, and proactive disruption of crime. Despite a distinct disparity between these strands of research, there has been a persevering evolution toward the implementation of a systematic forensic intelligence method for the examination of fraudulent identity documents. Since its initial inception into the research community, this method has expanded and been implemented across Europe, and Canada, with tests also being conducted in Australia. These first tangible steps toward a forensic intelligence capacity within document examination have also inspired new work using forensic intelligence and systematic comparisons within the field of handwriting examination, as well as the recognition of the transversal potential of this method, with it being applied to both physical and digital documents. In this review, the fields of document examination and forensic intelligence will first be introduced, along with a subsequent examination of the research that has led to the creation of a forensic intelligence model within the field of document examination. It should be noted that this review has largely been limited to a review of research that has been published in English and French due to the language of the authors.This article is categorized under: Crime Scene Investigation > From Traces to Intelligence and Evidence Forensic Chemistry and Trace Evidence > Emerging Technologies and Methods Crime Scene Investigation > Epistemology and Method

show abstract

Kirk’s ‘Ontogeny of Criminalistics’ revisited under the lens of the Sydney Declaration

Buzzini

2024

Forensic Science International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

De la police scientifique à la traçologie

Cited by 6 publications

References 277 publications

Fostering an “investigating mindset”: Why is it important in digital forensic science education?

Fostering an “investigating mindset”: Why is it important in digital forensic science education?

Forensic intelligence: Expanding the potential of forensic document examination

Kirk’s ‘Ontogeny of Criminalistics’ revisited under the lens of the Sydney Declaration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About