2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De-MetaST-BLAST: A Tool for the Validation of Degenerate Primer Sets and Data Mining of Publicly Available Metagenomes

Abstract: Development and use of primer sets to amplify nucleic acid sequences of interest is fundamental to studies spanning many life science disciplines. As such, the validation of primer sets is essential. Several computer programs have been created to aid in the initial selection of primer sequences that may or may not require multiple nucleotide combinations (i.e., degeneracies). Conversely, validation of primer specificity has remained largely unchanged for several decades, and there are currently few available p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…virus [ 11 ]. PCR amplification predictions were done using motif searches in CLC Genomics and the software De-MetaST-BLAST [ 127 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…virus [ 11 ]. PCR amplification predictions were done using motif searches in CLC Genomics and the software De-MetaST-BLAST [ 127 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degenerate primers were further modified and validated against nirK in the 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd and 4 th databases using De-MetaST for an in silico amplification (Gulvik et al, 2012). Four primer pairs were able to in silico amplify diverse fungal nirK, but were unlikely for nirK of bacteria, algae and protozoa, if allowing maximal 3-bp mismatches (Table 1).…”
Section: Primer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIPE avoids this problem through the use of a global alignment and the anchoring of primer binding sites. Because the results obtained by PrimerProspector included incorrect information for uncovered sections and cannot be used for primer evaluations and metagenome modifications, just like De-MetaST [27], we can only compare the match types from these two scripts case by case (Sheet: F515_annotation_of_difference and F806_annotation_of_difference in S3 Table). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some programs, such as PrimerProspector [25] and DegePrime [26], evaluate and develop primers for taxonomic classification, but these programs cannot be used for metagenome sequence datasets and do not include rRNA extraction and global alignment processes, which are necessary for rejecting incorrect primer binding sites in shotgun reads. The tool De-MetaST [27] is available for metagenome datasets but was designed to provide in silico amplicons generated by user-defined degenerate primers found within a user-defined nucleotide database. Therefore, this software only provides information for the covered but not the uncovered parts and cannot be used for the evaluation of primer coverage or for primer modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%