2016
DOI: 10.5117/9789462984615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De platformsamenleving. Strijd om publieke waarden in een online wereld

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 However, in 2016, the use of platform in the sense of a "general online infrastructure or coordination mechanism", including services run by large tech companies for different purposes, also emerged . Dutch media scholar José Van Dijck played a major role in this shift in meaning and approach, by publishing a book on the platform society (De Waal et al ., 2016) with two colleagues in 2016, and in the same year the Oxford Internet Institute organised a conference on the topic, at which Van Dijck was one of the keynote speakers .…”
Section: Platform As a Social Science And Marketing Concept (2006-2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 However, in 2016, the use of platform in the sense of a "general online infrastructure or coordination mechanism", including services run by large tech companies for different purposes, also emerged . Dutch media scholar José Van Dijck played a major role in this shift in meaning and approach, by publishing a book on the platform society (De Waal et al ., 2016) with two colleagues in 2016, and in the same year the Oxford Internet Institute organised a conference on the topic, at which Van Dijck was one of the keynote speakers .…”
Section: Platform As a Social Science And Marketing Concept (2006-2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, social media allows citizens and politicians to circumvent 'establishment' media outlets and filters and be less dependent on journalists as their mouthpiece. Second, social media algorithms are designed in such a way that content is selected not on the basis of journalistic quality standards (which occurred in the previous media ecology), but instead favor content that is popular, as measured by user interaction, viewer duration, and clickthrough (van Dijck et al, 2016, as cited in Hopster, 2021. Social media also invites a populist style of communication because of 'low-level' affordances such as short length requirements on Twitter and Weibo (which make it easy to create simple messages which is a characteristic of populist discourse), and 'like' buttons which drive emotional appeals, receive a lot of interaction, and reach larger audiences.…”
Section: Social Media and Populismmentioning
confidence: 99%