2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03078729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning als infrastructuur voor evidence-based gezondheidsbeleid

Abstract: Binnen de openbare gezondheidszorg speelt de notie van op 'evidence' gebaseerd beleid een steeds grotere rol. In dit artikel worden de rol en de betekenis van de VTV beschreven als kennisinstrument voor (overheids)beleid. Vanuit een wetenschapssociologische benadering is onderzocht op welke wijze de VTV zich positioneert als kennisinstrument binnen het gezondheidsbeleid. In hoeverre kunnen we hier spreken van 'evidence-based policy' en wat voor vorm neemt dat dan aan? De VTV fungeert, zoals blijkt uit onze ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These debates for one thing emphasized that clear measures about the public health status of Dutch citizens and the costs of the system, necessary to develop health policies, were lacking. Based on a government white paper, the ''Report 2000'' published in 1986, the government had commissioned the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) to develop a structural overview of the public health status of Dutch citizens, which was first published in 1993 (Boer 1986;NRV 1987;van Egmond et al 2007). Although with this report the government possessed a tool that provided insights into public health trends, it lacked an instrument to rationalize the financial policy choices in the health care system.…”
Section: The Need For One Economic Model For Health Care Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These debates for one thing emphasized that clear measures about the public health status of Dutch citizens and the costs of the system, necessary to develop health policies, were lacking. Based on a government white paper, the ''Report 2000'' published in 1986, the government had commissioned the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) to develop a structural overview of the public health status of Dutch citizens, which was first published in 1993 (Boer 1986;NRV 1987;van Egmond et al 2007). Although with this report the government possessed a tool that provided insights into public health trends, it lacked an instrument to rationalize the financial policy choices in the health care system.…”
Section: The Need For One Economic Model For Health Care Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP) took part, for its expertise on microeconomic modeling and its focus on socioeconomic issues in Dutch society, such as effects of health policy measures on, for example, the accessibility of health care for individuals 3 (Trommel 2003). In addition, the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) was asked, because of its expertise on public health issues 4 (van Egmond et al 2007). And the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Assessment (CPB), was asked for its expertise in economic modeling and its authoritative position in Dutch economic policy analysis 5 (Den Butter and Mosch 2003;Pesch 1999;Van den Bogaard 1999).…”
Section: The Need For One Economic Model For Health Care Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the accessibility of health care for individuals (Trommel, 2003). The third party was the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) that deals with many public health issues (van Egmond et al, 2007). These three science advisory institutions 5 are authoritative in the use of simulation models for the assessment of policy proposals for the Dutch National Government.…”
Section: Stans Van Egmond and Ragna Zeissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…real-life context. Knowledge production in public health should therefore be more tailored to what users of public health policy and practice need [ 9 – 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%